RESEARCH
Effects of Weight Reduction Interventions by Community Pharmacists

https://doi.org/10.1331/154434503322452210Get rights and content

Objective: To compare a meal replacement (MR) program with a conventional reduced-calorie diet (RCD) for weight management using the pharmacy as the setting and the pharmacist as the point of contact for dietary advice. Design: Randomized, controlled, open- label trial. Setting: Travis Pharmacy in Shenandoah, Iowa. Patients: Ninety-five patients from southwestern Iowa and southeastern Nebraska were enrolled, of whom 88 were considered eligible for comparison (by continuing through week 2 of the study). Intervention: Patients were randomized to an MR plan or a traditional RCD plan. Patients were followed for a 3-month period of active weight loss and a 10-week period of weight maintenance. Patients returned every 3 weeks for follow-up with the pharmacist, for a total of 13 visits. Main Outcome Measure: Weight changes. Results: During the active weight loss phase, the MR (n = 45) and RCD (n = 43) groups lost a significant amount of weight, although no significant difference was found between the groups (mean ± standard error = 4.90 ± 0.30 kg MR versus 4.30 ± 0.30 kg RCD; P = .16). In the weight maintenance phase, the MR group lost 0.70 ± 0.40 kg and the RCD group lost 0.90 ± 0.40 kg (P = .60). Significant improvements were observed in waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and triglyceride levels. No significant changes were seen in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in either group. Conclusion: Successful weight management can be achieved in a pharmacy setting. Both MR and RCD programs were effective.

Section snippets

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to compare an MR program with a conventional reduced-calorie diet (RCD) for weight management using the pharmacy as the setting and the pharmacist as the point of contact for dietary advice. The effect of these programs on overall health and modification of health risk factors was also assessed.

Setting

This randomized, controlled, open-label study was performed at Travis Pharmacy in Shenandoah, Iowa, in affiliation with the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The study protocol was approved by the medical center’s Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects.

Patients were block randomized to either the conventional RCD group or the MR group. Study participants were followed for 12 weeks during the active weight loss phase (period 1) and for an additional 10 weeks of weight

Demographics

Ninety-five patients, 83 women and 12 men, were screened and randomized to one of two treatment groups. Of those randomized, 88 patients continued through the end of week 2 and were considered eligible for comparison (see Table 1 for demographic information). Sixty-eight patients (72%) completed the active weight loss phase, and 55 (58%) completed the weight maintenance phase. No exclusions were made for nonadherence, but patients were able to voluntarily withdraw from the study. Patients

Discussion

People have difficulty losing weight and maintaining weight loss. Results from a survey published in 1999,26 conducted in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), reveal that in 1996, 28.8% and 35.1% of men in the United States attempted to lose weight and maintain weight loss, respectively; 43.6% and 3.4% of women made these attempts. Health care providers, pharmacists included, have not been very active in helping patients with these efforts. In the 1996 BRFSS survey of

Conclusion

In 2001 the U.S. Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity described obesity as an epidemic that, if left unaddressed, may soon “cause as much preventable disease and death as cigarette smoking.”38 With the prevalence of obesity in the United States today, and the numerous health risks associated with excess weight, easy-to-implement, effective weight management programs are needed. Both an MR strategy and an RCD were effective methods for weight loss and

References (38)

  • Manson JE, Skerrett PS, Willet WC. Obesity as a risk factor for major health outcomes. In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, eds....
  • A.M. Wolf et al.

    Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States

    Obes Res

    (1998)
  • D.J. Chisholm et al.

    Obesity: genes, glands or gluttony

    Reprod Fertil Dev.

    (1998)
  • X.F. Pi-Sunyer

    Short-term medical benefits and adverse effects of weight loss

    Ann Intern Med.

    (1993)
  • G. Blackburn

    Effect of degree of weight loss on health benefits

    Obes Res.

    (1995)
  • M. Flechtner-Mors et al.

    Metabolic and weight loss effects of long-term dietary intervention in obese patients four-year results

    Obes Res.

    (2000)
  • V.J. Stevens et al.

    Long-term weight loss and changes in blood pressure: results of the trials of hypertension prevention, phase II

    Ann Intern Med.

    (2001)
  • J.M. Ashley et al.

    Weight control in the physician's office

    Arch Intern Med.

    (2001)
  • S.B. Heymsfield et al.

    Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies

    Int J Obes.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (60)

    • The Effect of Meal Replacement on Weight Loss According to Calorie-Restriction Type and Proportion of Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      2021, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The initial search identified 493 potential studies for inclusion. Ultimately, 2227-30,33-50 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis (Figure 2), which included 24 interventions and a total of 1,982 patients. Twenty-one studies,27-30,33-49 including 22 interventions, compared MR-based LED with food-based LED; 1 of the studies,50 which included 2 interventions, compared MR-based VLED with food-based VLED.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests in any product or service mentioned in this article, including grants, employment, gifts, stock holdings, or honoraria.

    This study was funded by a grant from the Slim-Fast Nutrition Institute, West Palm Beach, Fla. The grant was used to cover overhead, supplies, and analysis costs for the study. No additional royalties were given to the authors.

    View full text