Figures
Abstract
Recognition of conspecifics and mates is based on a variety of sensory cues that are specific to the species, sex and social status of each individual. The courtship and mating activity of Drosophila melanogaster flies is thought to depend on the olfactory perception of a male-specific volatile pheromone, cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA), and the gustatory perception of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHs), some of which are sexually dimorphic. Using two complementary sampling methods (headspace Solid Phase Micro-Extraction [SPME] and solvent extraction) coupled with GC-MS analysis, we measured the dispersion of pheromonal CHs in the air and on the substrate around the fly. We also followed the variations in CHs that were induced by social and sexual interactions. We found that all CHs present on the fly body were deposited as a thin layer on the substrate, whereas only a few of these molecules were also detected in the air. Moreover, social experience during early adult development and in mature flies strongly affected male volatile CHs but not cVA, whereas sexual interaction only had a moderate influence on dispersed CHs. Our study suggests that, in addition to their role as contact cues, CHs can influence fly behavior at a distance and that volatile, deposited and body pheromonal CHs participate in a three-step recognition of the chemical identity and social status of insects.
Citation: Farine J-P, Ferveur J-F, Everaerts C (2012) Volatile Drosophila Cuticular Pheromones Are Affected by Social but Not Sexual Experience. PLoS ONE 7(7): e40396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040396
Editor: Patrick Callaerts, VIB & Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Received: February 15, 2012; Accepted: June 6, 2012; Published: July 11, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Farine et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The courtship behavior of Drosophila melanogaster has been the subject of intense investigation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, the sensory cues used to find a mate at a distance remain largely unknown. Many insects use sex pheromones to find and attract potential mates at long range [7], whereas fruit flies use both food-derived odors and pheromonal cues to gather on rotting fruits to feed and reproduce. D. melanogaster flies are attracted by volatile compounds produced by decaying fruits [8], [9], [10], and this effect can synergize with that of cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA) [11], a male-specific compound transferred to the female during copulation and deposited into the food during oviposition [12], [13]. Other plant odors such as phenylacetic acid can activate a Drosophila-specific olfactory receptor (IR84a) that enhances male courtship ardor [14]. In addition to volatile long-range pheromones, some insects mark the patch on which they feed to attract (or arrest) potential mates. Food scent marking has been frequently found in Hymenoptera [15] but rarely in Diptera: two species of Tephritidae males mark individual leaves that they defend as mating territories [16], [17], whereas Drosophila grimshawi males deposit a long-lasting pheromone that attracts females to the lek and increases their receptivity [18], [19]. cVA contributes to Drosophila aggregation and could also be involved in patch marking. Moreover, cVA regulates other social behaviors: at higher doses, it strongly inhibits male courtship [20], [21] and stimulates female mating [22], whereas at lower doses, it promotes male aggression [23]. Because cVA is common to many Drosophila species found on the same host plants [24], adults may use additional cues to discriminate the appropriate sex partner.
In Drosophila, the only other known sex pheromones consist of long-chain hydrocarbons covering the fly cuticle (cuticular hydrocarbons, CHs) [25], [26] whose primary function is to protect insects against environmental factors [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. D. melanogaster CHs show a marked sexual dimorphism: only females produce CHs with two double-bonds (dienes), while monoenes (with one double bond) are predominant in males [32], [33], [34]. Female dienes stimulate male courtship, whereas the principal male monoene, 7-tricosene (7-T), inhibits male courtship [35], [36], [37] and enhances female receptivity [38], [39]. Some quantitatively minor male monoenes may also have an important pheromonal role; e.g., 5-tricosene (5-T) may inhibit male courtship, and whereas 9- and 7-pentacosene (9-P and 7-P) could may enhance copulatory behavior [35], [40], [41]. Since As these CHs have a very reduced, or little or no volatility, they are mostly perceived by contact with the gustatory hairs located on the tarsi and proboscises of the fly [36], [42], [43], [44]. Several studies have hypothesized that Drosophila can detect at a small distance – with their olfactory organs –at small distances– – the CHs of conspecifics [38], [45], [46], [47]. However, their the volatility of CHs has never been shown, and it is not known whether D. melanogaster flies could can disperse CHs on the food substrate and/or into the surrounding air.
To investigate the potential dispersion of fly CHs in the environment, we used headspace Solid Phase Micro-Extraction (SPME) [48] and solvent extraction [49] coupled with GC-MS analysis. These methods allowed us to detect the presence of CHs in the air surrounding flies, on the floor of the chamber where they were kept and on their body. Because social interactions can affect CHs [50], [51], we monitored the effect of social experience on the above three CH fractions during early adult life and just after a social change in mature adults. Furthermore, we also measured the effect of sexual interactions on these three CHs fractions.
Results
To assess the effects of “early adult social experience” and “mature adult social shift” on Drosophila CH profiles, we compared CHs in flies that varied in the following social experiences: (i) rearing conditions for the first 5 days of imaginal life and (ii) quick changes in population density at 5-days-old.
Five-day old single- or group-reared flies (termed “S” and “G” flies, respectively) were either individually hexane-extracted or tested to examine the possible effect of a quick change in population density on CHs (Fig. 1). Ten S-flies were grouped for two hours for “socialization” after the 5-day isolation and then sacrificed for measurements. We termed these flies “Sg” to distinguish them from the flies that were sacrificed for measurements without experiencing any group rearing after the 5-day isolation (“S”). For comparison, 10 G-flies were similarly treated for measurements (“Gg” vs “G”). (Fig. 1). During the 2-hour socialization period, Sg and Gg flies were transferred from a large 100 ml volume vial in which they spent the first 5 days of adult life to a smaller chamber (15 ml), thus exposing them to an increased population density. This glass conical flask was fitted with a SPME fiber surrounded by a stainless steel mesh tubing that prevented the flies from touching the fiber (this reduced the available space to 8 ml, Fig. 2A). We used two complementary sampling tools to detect CHs in three physical fractions (Fig. 2): SPME allowed us to sample volatile CHs, whereas a hexane wash was used to recover the CHs deposited by the fly on the chamber floor (deposited CHs) and to collect the CHs present on the fly cuticle (body CHs). For the sake of clarity, we only show the 30 most abundant body CHs [52] (Table 1).
Five-day old singly reared flies (called “S”) were either individually hexane-extracted (body CHs) or grouped for two hours for “socialization” (groups of 10 same-sex flies = Sg) and thereafter sacrificed for measurements. Ten G-flies were similarly treated for measurements (“Gg” vs “G”). During the 2-hour socialization period, Sg and Gg flies were transferred from the large vial of 100 ml in volume, in which they spent the first five days of their adult life, to a smaller chamber (8 ml of available space) fitted with a SPME fiber. This fiber allowed us to sample volatile CHs emitted by flies during the 2-hour socialization period. Thereafter, Sg- and Gg-flies were individually hexane-extracted (body CHs), and the flask was hexane-rinsed (deposited CHs).
A. Experimental device: Ten five day-old flies were pooled for 2 hours in a 15 ml glass conical flask fitted with a PTFE-lined septum. A SPME holder was clamped in place to keep the fiber at the center of a stainless steel mesh tubing (1.3 cm ID) and to prevent flies from touching the fiber. B. GC-MS chromatograms of body, deposited and volatile CHs in Drosophila melanogaster male and female flies. The numbers shown above the peaks refer to the peak numbers (#) listed in Table 1. IS-1 and IS-2 are the internal standards used to calculate the absolute amounts of each CH. For details about sampling and GC-MS conditions, see Materials and Methods.
Some Volatile CHs are Affected by Early Adult Social Experience
To evaluate the effect of “early adult social experience”, we compared the three CH fractions from the Sg- and Gg-flies (n = 30 S-flies and n = 3×10 G-flies) separately for males and females.
Although all body CHs were deposited, only a part of them were detected in the volatile fraction (Fig. 2B); this included CHs ranging from n-heneicosane (n-C21) to n-tricosane (n-C23). Among these ≤ n-C23 CHs, 4 were common to both sexes (n-C21, n-C22, 7-T, n-C23), 5 were male-specific (cVA, 7-D, 23-Br, 9-T, 5-T), and one was female-specific (7,11-TD).
The overall amount of body CHs (Table S1) was significantly lower in males (Sg = 1954±23 ng; Gg = 2047±71 ng) than in females (Sg = 2154±34 ng, Gg = 2281±40 ng; K3df = 31.13, p≤10−4). Conversely, males produced more ≤ n-C23 compounds than females (K3df = 89.64, p≤10−4). Deposited CHs represented 1% of the amount of body CHs (relative to both overall and ≤ n-C23 compounds; Table S1) and showed no sex- or early adult social experience-related variation (K3df = 2.08, p = 0.61). In body and deposited CHs, ≤ n-C23 compounds represented 70% and 15% of the male and female total fraction, respectively. A higher amount of volatile CHs was detected in males (2–4 ng) than in females, regardless of early social experience (0.5 ng; Table S1; K3df = 8.74, p = 0.01). These amounts correspond to 0.1% and 0.02% of the total body CH amount in males and females, respectively, or to 0.2% of the amount of ≤ n-C23 compounds in both sexes.
Early social experience induced clear sex- and fraction-specific effects on ≤ n-C23 compounds (Fig. 3). Sg males showed decreased amounts of the tricosene isomers (9-, 7- and 5-T) and increased n-C23 levels compared to Sg males. This reciprocal variation was found in both deposited and volatile CHs fractions –but not in the body CHs– of Sg males. In contrast, the effect of early adult social experience was reduced in Sg females, which had a slightly higher proportion of 7-T in their body CHs compared to Sg females.
During the five first days of adult life, flies were either reared singly (Sg) or grouped (Gg). The histograms represent the mean proportion (± SEM) of each compound in males (top) and females (bottom) relative to the total amount of ≤n-C-23 compounds in body CHs (n = 30), deposited CHs (n = 3×10 individuals), and volatile CHs (n = 3×10 individuals). The p-value shown for each CH and sex indicate the results obtained with a Kruskal-Wallis test on summed data. Different letters indicate significant differences (p = 0.05).
Social Change Quickly Alters Body CHs in Mature Flies
We compared CHs from same-sex S-, Sg-, G- and Gg-flies to evaluate the effect of a “mature adult social shift ” on the three CH fractions.
The body CH profiles strongly differed between S and G flies for both sexes, and a social shift in mature adults induced quick and sex-specific changes in their profiles. The strong initial difference between S and G males was abolished in Sg and Gg males, which showed overlapping profiles after two hours pooling (Fig. 4A). S and G females also clearly differed in their initial body CH profiles; mature adult social shift differently affected Sg and Gg females, whose profiles only partially overlapped (Fig. 4B). In particular, the body CH profile of Sg females was intermediate between those of the G and Gg females. Mature adult social shift did not affect the deposited or volatile CH fractions in either sex.
To assess the effect of early adult social experience, we compared the body CHs of male (A) and female (B) flies reared either singly (S) or in groups (G). The effect of mature adult social experience was detected after the comparison of S and G flies pooled for 2 hours (Sg and Gg, respectively) in a small size chamber by groups of 10. The first plane of a stepwise discriminant analysis (DA) using the alr-transformed proportions of all the body CHs as quantitative variables and the social factors (S, G, Sg and Gg) as qualitative variable explains more than 90% of the total variability in both male and female flies. For all experiments, n = 10.
A two-way ANOVA (Table S2) allowed us to determine the effects of early adult social experience, mature adult social shift, and the interaction of these two factors on each CH and on cVA. Strikingly, cVA was the only male compound that was not affected by either condition (Table S2). Moreover, early adult social experience significantly affected 13 male CHs: the 7 most volatile CHs (n-C21, n-C22, 23-Br, 9-T, 7-T, n-C23 and 25-Br) were always more abundant and the 6 less volatile ones (9-P, 7-P, n-C27, 29-Br, n-C29, 31-Br) were less abundant in Sg compared to Gg males. Seventeen male CHs were significantly affected by adult social shift (and 16 by the “early experience-by-social shift” interaction) regardless of their physical or chemical properties. In females, 12 CHs were affected by early social experience, 10 were affected by adult social shift, and 8 were affected by the interaction of these factors (Table S2). However, no clear-cut pattern emerged from the CH variability in females.
Sexual Context does not Alter the Proportions of Drosophila Volatile CHs
We also measured the effect of sexual interaction on the volatile CH fractions using 5 or 10 heterosexual pairs of S-flies (previously kept isolated) pooled in the small chamber after the 5-day isolation (SPx5 and SPx10, respectively). Their CH profiles were compared with those of Sg-males and -females (Sg-M and Sg-F, respectively) (Fig. S1). The overall amount of volatile CHs was higher in Sg-M and in SPx10 pairs (3.3±0.3 and 3.5±0.2 ng/fly, respectively) than in the Sg-F (0.8±0.1 ng/fly), whereas the amount of volatile CHs was intermediate in SPx5 pairs (2.6±0.7 ng/fly; K3df = 25.85, p<10−4). Every ≤ n-C23 compound followed a parallel pattern of variation, except cVA and 7,11-TD.
Discussion
Long-range pheromonal communication in D. melanogaster flies was initially hypothesized one century ago [53], and it received experimental support for several decades [54]. However, the only known volatile pheromone is cVA [12], whereas long-chain cuticular hydrocarbons (CHs), which have limited volatility, were only suspected to be detected by gustation [36], [42], [43], [44]. Several studies suggested that CHs can also be perceived at a short-distance by olfaction [25], [38], [45], [55], [56], but their volatility was never shown. Our study reveals that flies can deposit CHs on the substrate and spray CHs into the surrounding air. The dispersion of these CHs can vary both with the early and mature adult social experiences, but not with sexual interaction.
Drosophila Adults Deposit All their CHs on the Substrate and Emit the Most Volatile Ones in the Surrounding Air
Two hours after being pooled in same-sex groups, singly raised flies (both sexes) deposited 1% of their body CHs on the substrate and sprayed 0.2% of their most volatile cuticular compounds (≤ n-C23) into the surrounding air.
As hydrocarbon volatility decreases with chain length [57], the selective detection of ≤ n-C23 compounds in the air constitutes a intriguing finding because no relationship was found between the volatile compounds detected by SPME, their amounts on the fly body, and/or their chain length. For example, we did not detect compounds with carbon chains > C23 (such as pentacosene isomers and n-C25), which are found in cuticular profiles (i) in similar amounts as tricosenes and n-C23 and (ii) in larger amounts than n-C21 and n-C22. This also contrasts with experiments using SPME sampling in cockroaches [58] and termites [59], which allows for the detection of airborne C25-C29 CHs, compounds that were nevertheless present at low concentrations on the body surface of these insects. Therefore, the differences in CH volatility between cockroaches, termites and Drosophila and between Drosophila sexes could be related to different interactions between CHs and the cuticular matrix [60].
Both deposited and volatile cuticular compounds may affect mate recognition before the first physical contact. Volatile CHs could provide a cue to guide potential sex-partners at a short distance, whereas deposited CHs could have an arresting effect and ensure that the flies remain on the marked patch of food for long durations. When resources (food or mates) are unevenly distributed, it may be an optimal strategy for animals to engage in an intensive search only on marked patches [61]. Although this context-dependent search strategy has only been described in food searching for D. melanogaster [62], [63], volatile and deposited pheromones are used by other species for mate finding. For example, the Ichneumonid Venturia canescens male is attracted by volatile compounds emitted both by the host and his female; he uses female chemicals left on the food patch to locate her [64]. D. grimshawi males deposit a long-lasting pheromone (of unknown nature) on the substrate that attracts conspecifics and increases mating success [18], [19]. The synergistic effect of olfactory and gustatory perception of pheromonal hydrocarbons has also been shown in the leek moth [65]. Similarly, Drosophila flies may be attracted at a short distance by the combined smell of food and conspecific odor [8], [9], [13], [66] and be further arrested after tasting the CHs left on food patches. However, this has never been directly demonstrated. The volatile CHs of a potential sexual partner could also be perceived by the male immediately prior to his first gustatory contact [56] and may determine whether courtship should be further pursued [1]. Male courtship behavior may be elicited by taste perception of female CHs [67] and modulated by olfactory perception [68].
The combined effect of olfaction and taste perception of pheromones on Drosophila male sexual behavior may be mediated by several olfactory receptors (Or47b, Or65a, Or67d and Or88a) that respond to fly odors [45], as well as by gustatory receptors (GR32a, Gr33a and GR68a) that are potentially stimulated by CHs [69], [70], [71]. The combined olfactory and gustatory perception of cVA and 7-T (with Or67d- and Gr32a-expressing neurons) may explain their effect on the modulation of male courtship and aggressive behaviors [22], [23], [51], [70], [72], [73]. The gustatory perception of female and male CHs in Gr68a- and Gr32a-expressing neurons, respectively [69], [70], requires the Gr33a co-receptor [71], and may also require Or47b- and Or88a-expressing neurons, to regulate male courtship behavior [45]. However, because the ligands of Or47b and Or88a remain unknown, these receptors may be involved in the detection of some of the volatile CHs described in the present study.
Social Density Change in Mature Adults Alters Fly CHs More Strongly than Early Adult Social Experience
Variations in the social environment can affect Drosophila male courtship and aggressive behaviors cuticular profiles [37], [50]. A change of the social structure also induces rapid CH variations in crickets [74]. Moreover, our current data reveal a relationship between the social experience of fruit flies and their volatile pheromone profile.
In our study, we compared the effects induced by two types of social experience: (i) a long-lasting exposure during early adult development and (ii) a rapid shift during mature adult life. Our results indicate that both types of social experience can affect the CHs found on the fly body, released in the air, and released onto the substrate. Social experience generally induced a greater effect in males than in females. Moreover, ≤ n-C23 compounds were present in higher amounts –and other CHs were present in lower amounts– in isolated males than in group-reared males. Our results support the hypothesis of a previous study that the D. melanogaster male cuticular profile is not only determined by the genotype or by the environment [50] but also by individual experience in males and –to a lesser extent– in females. However, these studies diverged in the following aspects: in the former study, most fly body CHs (except 9-T, n-C24 and 29-Br) were significantly affected by the group composition (with the highest effect on n-C27 and cVA), whereas 7-T showed the highest amount of variability related to the social-by-environment interaction [50]. In contrast, we found that cVA was the only male compound that does not vary with social experience (supporting a recent finding [51]) and that 7-T was only slightly affected by social experience. These discrepancies may be explained by the different genotypic structures of the populations used in both studies (wild-type males were either mixed [50] or not [the present study] with mutant males) and/or the variety of methods used to analyze CHs. Moreover, only volatile and deposited CHs were measured in our study. A genotype-by-experience interaction has previously been shown to differentially affect male courtship behavior, and these effects may be related to the CH profile [75].
The adjustment of the three CH fractions (body, deposited, and volatile) as a response to social experience differed between the sexes: males and females were similarly affected by early adult exposure, while males were more affected than females by the mature adult shift. This male-specific “late” effect may be caused by the frequent aggressive interaction between mature males that is related to a pheromonal change [23], [51], [73], [76], [77], [78], [79]. Social experience during early adult life induces different effects; it reduces male aggressive or dominant behavior via chronic exposure to cVA [51], 7-T and/or 7-P during the first 24 hours of adult life [80]. This indicates that 7-T and 7-P act in a hierarchical manner with cVA to regulate Drosophila male aggressive and dominance behavior [73]. Therefore, early adult exposure of grouped males to cVA may reduce their emission of 7-T (and other volatile CHs), which, in turn, could reduce male-male aggressive behavior.
Strikingly, early adult experience induced reciprocal effects on the proportions of two sets of male CHs; the tricosene isomers decreased, whereas n-tricosane increased. This effect was found in both deposited and volatile CHs compared to body CHs. Because the level of these two sets of CHs is linked by the biosynthetic activity of enzymes such as Δ-9 desaturase (coded by the desat1 gene), social experience may interfere with the expression of this gene to regulate the level and emission of some CHs [34], [50]. However, this does not explain why social experience differentially affected the deposited and volatile CHs and not the body CHs.
Sexual Context does not Alter the Amounts of Volatile CHs
In contrast to social interaction, sexual interaction had a limited effect on CHs; it did not change the level of volatile compounds, and the variation of most volatile ≤ n-C23 compounds (except 7,11-TD) was proportional to the number of males involved in the group. This result is in contrast to that obtained in our previous study [52] that showed that mating interaction can rapidly alter body CHs either by a reciprocal mechanical transfer of male predominant monoenes (plus cVA) to the female cuticle and of female dienes to the male cuticle or by the unilateral post-mating variation of some CHs previously identified as putative ur-pheromones that potentially induce a non-species specific sexual excitation [81]. The differential interactions between CHs and the cuticular matrix [60] could be the basis of the observed differences between our previous and current findings on the effect of sexual context on body and volatile CHs.
In summary, our data suggest that Drosophila CHs participate in at least three successive sequences of pheromone perception during mate choice and courtship behavior. First, flies attracted by food odors combined with cVA [8], [9], [10], [11], [13], [14], [66] may be arrested on the food patch marked with deposited CHs. Second, volatile CHs could facilitate the localization, at a short-distance, of potential mates and/or enhance some preliminary steps of male and female courtship [35], [38], [56]. Third, body CHs could be perceived by contact to enhance or inhibit male courtship behavior [33], [35], [36], [37], [67]. Female CHs have previously been shown to act in three sequential reproduction-related aspects: mate choice, copulation duration and the sex-ratio of the progeny [82].
Our next challenge will be to better understand the behavioral role of the deposited and volatile CHs of Drosophila flies during their social and sexual interaction and to map the neural structures involved in their detection.
Materials and Methods
Fly Husbandry
Flies of the wild-type strain Dijon 2000 (Di2 [37]) were raised and tested at 24±0.5°C and 65±5% relative humidity on a 12∶12 h L:D cycle. Stocks were maintained in 150 ml glass vials containing 50 ml of yeast/cornmeal/agar laboratory medium.
General Methods
Each morning, 1-h-old flies were sexed under light CO2 anesthesia and kept in fresh-food vials either singly (S) or in groups of 10 (or 5) flies (G) of the same sex. At 5 days old, S and G flies were either individually hexane-extracted or grouped either in same-sex or in heterosexual groups. To examine the possible effect of social interactions on CH profiles, 10 S-flies were grouped for 2 hours for “socialization” after the 5-day isolation and thereafter sacrificed for measurements. We termed these flies “Sg” to distinguish them from the flies that were sacrificed for measurements without experiencing any group rearing after the 5-day isolation (“S”). For comparison, 10 G-flies were similarly treated before measurements (“Gg” vs “G”). During the 2-hr socialization period, the flies were transferred from a large 100 ml volume vial in which they spent the prior 5-days to a small 15 ml volume chamber to expose them to a high population density (Fig. 1). This 15 ml glass conical flask was fitted with a PTFE-lined septum (Fig. 2A). A Supelco SPME holder was clamped in place in such a way that the SPME fiber was at the center of a stainless steel mesh tubing (1.3 cm ID) to prevent flies from touching the fiber. In this device, flies had 8 ml of available space. To examine the possible effect of sexual interactions on volatile CH profiles, S-flies were gathered in groups of 5 or 10 heterosexual pairs (SPx5 and SPx10, respectively) for two hours in the same device.
As in a previous study [52], we used a StableFlex fiber covered with carbowax/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB, 70 µm, Supelco, St Quentin-Fallavier, France). Prior to each sampling, the fiber was conditioned for 30 min at 230°C in the injection port of a gas chromatograph (GC). According to the type of experiment, we collected volatile chemicals from the flask headspace using SPME (volatile CHs), we rinsed the flask with hexane (deposited CHs), and/or we individually extracted the fly CHs with hexane (body CHs).
Cuticular Hydrocarbon Sampling
Volatile CHs.
The SPME sampling recovery rates were first determined using various amounts (500 ng, 1, 5 and 10 µg) of synthetic compounds (n-C21, n-C22, n-C23, n-C24, n-C25, cVA, 9-T) that contribute to the cuticular profile of D. melanogaster. Ten microliters of a hexane mixture that included all compounds was deposited on a 1 cm2 glass microscope lamella. The solvent was allowed to evaporate for 1 min at room temperature before the lamella was introduced in the flask, and the volatiles collected for 2 hours. To sample volatile CHs of fly groups, we collected the headspace volatile chemicals for 2 hours after fly pooling (no change was noted after 6-hours of sampling except for traces of 25-Br).
After retraction of the fiber, the SPME device was introduced for 1 min into the injection port of a GC-MS to allow the compounds to desorb. We used a QP2010 Shimadzu GC-MS apparatus in splitless mode fitted with a VF-1ms fused silica capillary column (20 m×0.15 mm ID, 0.15 µm film thickness; Varian, The Netherland). The column was held isothermally at 140°C and then programmed at a rate of 3°C/min to 300°C. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a linear velocity of 47 cm/sec. The injector port was set at 280°C. The mass spectrometer was operated at 70 eV and scanning was performed from 29 to 600 amu at 0.5 scans/sec. The injection split was opened 1 min after injection. The detected components were identified using their Kovats’ indices [83]. The fragmentation patterns and diagnostic ions of the components were then compared with the NIST/EPA/NIH library, our own mass-spectrum library and previously published Drosophila CHs. The linearity and the calibration of the detector response were tested by injection of 1 µl of hexane solutions of the corresponding compounds over the range of 0.1, 0.5, 10 and 100 ng of n-C21, n-C22, n-C23, n-C24, n-C25, cVA and 9-T. We used the resulting calibration curves to calculate the absolute amount of the volatile CHs.
Body CHs.
After headspace SPME sampling of volatile CHs, the flies were cold anesthetized (5 min at −20°C) and individually plunged, at room temperature, for 5 min into vials containing 30 µl hexane with 100 ng n-C26 and 100 ng n-C30 as internal standards (IS-1 and IS-2, respectively) following standard procedures [49]. IS-1 and -2 compounds were chosen because Di2 flies of both sexes lack these alkanes. After fly removal, the extracts were stored at −20°C until their analysis using the same GC-MS conditions employed for the volatile CHs. IS-1 and IS-2 were used to estimate the absolute amount of all the body CHs.
Deposited CHs.
After volatile CHs sampling and removal of the flies, we rinsed the flask with 1 ml hexane containing 100 ng each of IS-1 and IS-2 to collect the deposited CHs. The hexane rinse was reduced to approximately 30 µl under a light N2 stream, and GC-MS analyses were performed with similar conditions as those previously described. IS-1 and IS-2 were used to estimate the absolute amount of all the deposited CHs.
Statistical Procedures
Statistics were performed using XLSTAT 2011 [84]. To compare the 3 CH fractions (body, deposited and volatile), we used the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Monte-Carlo resampling of the N values (105 simulations) to compute the associated p-value. Significant Kruskal-Wallis tests were followed with Conover-Iman’s multiple pairwise comparisons (two-tailed with Bonferroni correction).
To assess the effect of social context on the cuticular profiles, the relative amounts of body CHs were transformed with the additive log-ratio transformation (alr) [85] using CoDaPack (v2.01.1; [86]); the zero values were substituted by 10−6 values and the divisor was taken to be the proportion of 31-Br. For each sex, we carried out a stepwise (forward; entry threshold: p = 0.05; removal threshold: p = 0.10) discriminant analysis (DA) using the alr-transformed CH proportions as quantitative variables and the social context as a qualitative variable. The effects of early adult social experience and mature adult social shift, and their interaction, were tested using a two-way ANOVA after a Box-Cox transformation (optimized Lambda) of the body CH proportions.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Absolute amounts of the ≤n-C23 volatile compounds in different groups of flies. Compounds were sampled in same sex groups (x10) of males (Sg-M) and females (Sg-F) and in groups of 5 and 10 heterosexual pairs (SPx5 and SPx10, respectively). The amounts are expressed in ng/individual as the mean (SEM or range). Letters indicate significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test). For compound names, see Table1. n = 5×10 or 20 individuals.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040396.s001
(EPS)
Table S1.
Amount of all compounds and of ≤n-C23 compounds in body, deposited and volatile CH fractions from 5-day-old S- and G-flies grouped in same-sex groups of 10 individuals for a two hour “socialization” period in a small 15 ml vial (Sg- and Gg-flies). The amounts are expressed as the mean (SEM or range) in units of ng/individual. Letters indicate significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.05). 1: As volatile fractions consisted of only ≤n-C23 compounds, their amount values were tested only once.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040396.s002
(EPS)
Table S2.
Results of the two-way ANOVA using the Cox-Box transformed CH proportions of all the cuticular compounds as quantitative variables and the two social changes (early, mature), in male (A) and female (B). HSD: letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.05). For compound names, see Table1. (n = 5×10 or 20 individuals).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040396.s003
(EPS)
Acknowledgments
We thank Serge Loquin and José Solonot for technical help and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JPF CE. Performed the experiments: JPF CE. Analyzed the data: CE. Wrote the paper: JFF CE.
References
- 1. Greenspan RJ, Ferveur JF (2000) Courtship in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 34: 205–232.
- 2. Hall JC (2002) Courtship lite: a personal history of reproductive behavioral neurogenetics in Drosophila. Journal of Neurogenetics 16: 135–163.
- 3. O’Dell K (2003) The voyeurs’ guide to Drosophila melanogaster courtship. Behav Process 64: 211–223.
- 4. Lasbleiz C, Ferveur JF, Everaerts C (2006) Courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster revisited. Anim Behav 72: 1001–1012.
- 5. Yamamoto D, Jallon JM, Komatsu A (1997) Genetic dissection of sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Entomol 42: 551–585.
- 6. Meissner G, Manoli D, Chavez J, Knapp J, Lin T, et al. (2011) Functional dissection of the neural substrates for sexual behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 189: 195–U875. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.129940.
- 7.
Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour. Communication by smell and taste. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 1st Ed p 391.
- 8. Becher PG, Bengtsson M, Hansson BS, Witzgall P (2010) Flying the fly: long-range flight behavior of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors J Chem Ecol 36: 599–607.
- 9. Budick SA, Dickinson MH (2006) Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors. J Exp Biol 209: 3001–3017.
- 10. Hansson BS, Knaden M, Sachse S, Stensmyr MC, Wicher D (2010) Towards plant-odor-related olfactory neuroethology in Drosophila. Chemoecology 20: 51–61.
- 11. Griffith LC, Ejima A (2009) Multimodal sensory integration of courtship stimulating cues in Drosophila melanogaster. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170: 394–398.
- 12. Butterworth FM (1969) Lipids of Drosophila: a newly detected lipid in the male. Science 163: 1356–1357.
- 13. Bartelt RJ, Schaner AM, Jackson LL (1985) Cis-Vaccenyl acetate as an aggregation pheromone in Drosophila melanogaster. J Chem Ecol 11: 1747–1756.
- 14. Grosjean Y, Rytz R, Farine JP, Abuin L, Cortot J, et al. (2011) An olfactory receptor for food-derived odours promotes male courtship in Drosophila. Nature 478: 236–240.
- 15. Ayasse M, Paxton RJ, Tengo J (2001) Mating behavior and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 46: 31–78.
- 16. Sivinski J, Epsky N, Heath RR (1994) Pheromone deposition on leaf territories by male Caribbean fruit flies, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Behav 7: 43–51.
- 17. Shelly T (2004) Scent marking by males of the mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Behav 17: 709–722.
- 18. Droney D, Hock M (1998) Male sexual signals and female choice in Drosophila grimshawi (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Insect Behav 11: 59–71.
- 19. Widemo F, Johansson BG (2006) Male-male pheromone signalling in a lekking Drosophila. Proc Biol Sci 273: 713–717.
- 20. Jallon JM, Antony C, Benamar O (1981) An anti-aphrodisiac produced by Drosophila melanogaster males and transferred to females during copulation. C R Acad Sci Ser III Sci Vie 292: 1147–1149.
- 21. Zawistowski S, Richmond RC (1986) inhibition of courtship and mating of Drosophila melanogaster by the male-produced lipid, cis-vaccenyl acetate. J Insect Physiol 32: 189–192.
- 22. Kurtovic A, Widmer A, Dickson BJ (2007) A single class of olfactory neurons mediates behavioural responses to a Drosophila sex pheromone. Nature 446: 542–546.
- 23. Wang L, Anderson DJ (2010) Identification of an aggression-promoting pheromone and its receptor neurons in Drosophila. Nature 463: 227–231.
- 24. Symonds MRE, Wertheim B (2005) The mode of evolution of aggregation pheromones in Drosophila species. J Evol Biol 18: 1253–1263.
- 25. Ferveur JF (2005) Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behavior Genetics 35: 279–295.
- 26. Wicker-Thomas C (2007) Pheromonal communication involved in courtship behavior in Diptera. J Insect Physiol 53: 1089–1100.
- 27. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (1982) Chemical ecology and biochemistry of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol 27: 149–172.
- 28. Blomquist G, Nelson D, de Renobales M (1987) Chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology of insect cuticular lipids. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 6: 227–265.
- 29. Gibbs AG, Fukuzato F, Matzkin LM (2003) Evolution of water conservation mechanisms in Drosophila. J Exp Biol 206: 1183–1192.
- 30. Rouault JD, Marican C, Wicker-Thomas C, Jallon JM (2004) Relations between cuticular hydrocarbon (HC) polymorphism, resistance against desiccation and breeding temperature; a model for HC evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetica 120: 195–212.
- 31. Foley BR, Telonis-Scott M (2011) Quantitative genetic analysis suggests causal association between cuticular hydrocarbon composition and desiccation survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 106: 68.
- 32. Antony C, Jallon JM (1982) The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 28: 873–880.
- 33. Jallon JM (1984) A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behavior Genetics 14: 441–478.
- 34. Marcillac F, Grosjean Y, Ferveur JF (2005) A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 272: 303–309.
- 35. Ferveur JF, Sureau G (1996) Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 263: 967–973.
- 36. Lacaille F, Hiroi M, Twele R, Inoshita T, Umemoto D, et al. (2007) An inhibitory sex pheromone tastes bitter for Drosophila males. PLoS One 2(8): e661.
- 37. Svetec N, Ferveur JF (2005) Social experience and pheromonal perception can change male-male interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 208: 891–898.
- 38. Grillet M, Dartevelle L, Ferveur JF (2006) A Drosophila male pheromone affects female sexual receptivity. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser. B 273: 315–323.
- 39. Scott D, Shields A, Straker M, Dalrymple H, Dhillon PK, et al. (2011) Variation in the male pheromones and mating success of wild caught Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 6(8): e23645.
- 40. Siwicki KK, Riccio P, Ladewski L, Marcillac F, Dartevelle L, et al. (2005) The role of cuticular pheromones in courtship conditioning of Drosophila males. Learning, Memory 12: 636–645.
- 41. Krupp JJ, Kent C, Billeter JC, Azanchi R, So AKC, et al. (2008) Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 18: 1373–1383.
- 42. Boll W, Noll M (2002) The Drosophila Pox neuro gene: control of male courtship behavior and fertility as revealed by a complete dissection of all enhancers. Development 129: 5667–5681.
- 43. Shanbhag S, Park S, Pikielny C, Steinbrecht R (2001) Gustatory organs of Drosophila melanogaster: fine structure and expression of the putative odorant-binding protein PBPRP2. Cell Tissue Res 304: 23–437.
- 44. Stocker RF (1994) The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster - a review. Cell Tissue Res 275: 3–26.
- 45. van der Goes van Naters W, Carlson JR (2007) Receptors and neurons for fly odors in Drosophila. Curr Biol 17: 606–612.
- 46. Mehren JE (2007) Mate recognition: Should fly stay, or should fly go? Curr Biol 17: R240–R242.
- 47. Lebreton S, Becher PG, Hansson BH, Witzgall P (2012) Attraction of Drosophila melanogaster males to food-related and fly odours. J Insect Physiol 58: 125–129.
- 48. Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J (1990) Solid-phase microextraction with thermal-desorption using fused-silica optical fibers. Anal Chem 62: 2145–2148.
- 49. Ferveur JF, Jallon JM (1993) Genetic-control of pheromones in Drosophila simulans.2. Kete, a locus on the X-chromosome. Genetics 133: 561–567.
- 50. Kent C, Azanchi R, Smith B, Formosa A, Levine JD (2008) Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Curr Biol 18: 1384–1389.
- 51. Liu W, Liang X, Gong J, Yang Z, Zhang YH, et al. (2011) Social regulation of aggression by pheromonal activation of Or65a olfactory neurons in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 14: 896–902.
- 52. Everaerts C, Farine JP, Cobb M, Ferveur JF (2010) Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles. PLoS One 5(3): e9607.
- 53. Sturtevant AH (1915) Experiments on sex recognition and the problems of sexual selection in Drosophila. Anim Behav 5: 351–366.
- 54. Shorey H, Bartell R (1970) Role of a volatile female sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 18: 159–164.
- 55. Rybak F, Aubin T, Moulin B, Jallon JM (2002) Acoustic communication in Drosophila melanogaster courtship: are pulse- and sine-song frequencies important for courtship success? Can J Zool 80: 987–996.
- 56. Everaerts C, Lacaille F, Ferveur JF (2010) Is mate choice in Drosophila males guided by olfactory or gustatory pheromones? Anim Behav 79: 1135–1146.
- 57. Chikos JS, Wilson JA (1994) Vaporization enthalpies at 298.15 K of the n-alkanes from C21 to C28 and C30. J Chem Eng Data 42: 190–197.
- 58. Said I, Gaertner C, Renou M, Rivault C (2005) Perception of cuticular hydrocarbons by the olfactory organs in Periplaneta americana (L.) (Insecta : Dictyoptera). J Insect Physiol 51: 1384–1389.
- 59. Bland JM, Osbrink WLA, Cornelius ML, Lax AR, Vigo CG (2001) Solid-phase microextraction for the detection of termite cuticular hydrocarbons. J Chromatogr A 932: 119–127.
- 60. Levine J, Billeter JC, Krull U, Sodhi R (2011) The cuticular surface of D. melanogaster: ToF-SIMS on the fly. Surf Interface Anal 43: 317–321.
- 61. Chow D, Frye M (2009) The neuro-ecology of resource localization in Drosophila. Fly 3: 50–61.
- 62. Bell W, Tortorici C, Roggero R, Kipp L, Tobin T (1985) Sucrose-stimulated searching behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in a uniform habitat – modulation by period of deprivation. Anim Behav 33: 436–448.
- 63. Tortorici C, Brody A, Bell W (1986) Influence of spatial patterning of resources on search orientation of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 34: 1568–1570.
- 64. Metzger M, Fischbein D, Auguste A, Fauvergue X, Bernstein C, et al. (2010) Synergy in information use for mate finding: demonstration in a parasitoid wasp. Anim Behav 79: 1307–1315.
- 65. Lecomte C, Thibout E, Pierre D, Auger J (1998) Transfer, perception, and activity of male pheromone of Acrolepiopsis assectella with special reference to conspecific male sexual inhibition. J Chem Ecol 24: 655–671.
- 66. Schlief ML, Wilson RI (2007) Olfactory processing and behavior downstream from highly selective receptor neurons. Nat Neurosci 10: 623–630.
- 67. Kohatsu S, Koganezawa M, Yamamoto D (2011) Female contact activates male-specific interneurons that trigger stereotypic courtship behavior in Drosophila. Neuron 69: 498–508.
- 68. Inoshita T, Martin JR, Marion-Poll F, Ferveur JF (2011) Peripheral, central and behavioral responses to the cuticular pheromone bouquet in Drosophila melanogaster males. PLoS One 6(5): e19770.
- 69. Bray S, Amrein H (2003) A putative Drosophila pheromone receptor expressed in male-specific taste neurons is required for efficient courtship. Neuron 39: 1019–1029.
- 70. Miyamoto T, Amrein H (2008) Suppression of male courtship by a Drosophila pheromone receptor. Nat Neurosci 11: 874–876.
- 71. Moon SJ, Lee Y, Jiao Y, Montell C (2009) A Drosophila gustatory receptor essential for aversive taste and inhibiting male-to-male courtship. Curr Biol 19: 1623–1627.
- 72. Ronderos DS, Smith DP (2010) Activation of the T1 neuronal circuit is necessary and sufficient to induce sexually dimorphic mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci 30: 2595–2599.
- 73. Wang L, Han X, Mehren J, Hiroi M, Billeter JC, et al. (2011) Hierarchical chemosensory regulation of male-male social interactions in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 14: 757–762.
- 74. Thomas ML, Simmons LW (2011) Short-term phenotypic plasticity in long-chain cuticular hydrocarbons. Proc Biol Sci 278: 3123–3128.
- 75. Svetec N, Houot B, Ferveur JF (2005) Effect of genes, social experience, and their interaction on the courtship behaviour of transgenic Drosophila males. Genet Res 85: 183–193.
- 76. Fernandez MP, Chan YB, Yew JY, Billeter JC, Dreisewerd K, et al. (2010) Pheromonal and behavioral cues trigger male-to-female aggression in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 8(11): e1000541.
- 77. Villaverde ML, Girotti JR, Mijailovsky SJ, Pedrini N, Juarez MP (2009) Volatile secretions and epicuticular hydrocarbons of the beetle Ulomoides dermestoides. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 154: 381–386.
- 78. Vrontou E, Nilsen SP, Demir E, Kravitz EA, Dickson BJ (2006) fruitless regulates aggression and dominance in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 9: 1469–1471.
- 79. Zwarts L, Magwire MM, Carbone MA, Versteven M, Herteleer L, et al. (2011) Complex genetic architecture of Drosophila aggressive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 17070–17075.
- 80. Svetec N, Cobb M, Ferveur JF (2005) Chemical stimuli induce courtship dominance in Drosophila. Curr Biol 15: R790–R792.
- 81. Savarit F, Sureau G, Cobb M, Ferveur JF (1999) Genetic elimination of known pheromones reveals the fundamental chemical bases of mating and isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96: 9015–9020.
- 82. Marcillac F, Ferveur JF (2004) A set of female pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila. J Exp Biol 207: 3927–3933.
- 83. Carlson DA, Bernier UR, Sutton BD (1998) Elution patterns from capillary GC for methyl-branched alkanes. J Chem Ecol 24: 1845–1865.
- 84.
Addinsoft (1995–2011) XLstat. Data analysis and statistics with Microsoft Excel (Paris, France), 2011.4.02/MacOS.
- 85.
Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Mono-graphs on statistics and applied probability. (Chapman, Hall Ltd., London (UK)) p 416.
- 86. Thió-Henestrosa S, Martín-Fernández JA (2005) Dealing with compositional data: the freeware CoDaPack. Mathematical Geology. 37(7): 773–793.