Skip to main content
Log in

The Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis is Greater in Morbidly Obese Men Compared to Women

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a form of liver injury that is common in morbidly obese subjects. It has been shown that gender differences exist in the spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The focus of this study was to further characterize these gender differences based on ATP III criteria used to diagnose the metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods: We retrospectively assessed NAFLD 58 men and 307 women who underwent gastric bypass, for the presence of NASH, MS, and positive predictors of NASH. Results: There was no statistical difference in age, gender, or the presence of diabetes. The prevalence of NASH in men and women was 60.3% and 30.9%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed an association of male gender with NASH (2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6, P=0.006) as well as age, AST, and diabetes. MS was diagnosed in 91.4% and 76.2% of men and women (P=0.008), and men tended to have more criteria for MS compared to women. The only positive predictor of MS that was statistically significant between genders was high triglycerides (P=0.003). Controlling for BMI and excess body weight produced similar results. Conclusions: Gender differences do exist within NAFLD and MS, that may be associated with free fatty acid flow to the liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arun, J., Clements, R.H., Lazenby, A.J. et al. The Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis is Greater in Morbidly Obese Men Compared to Women. OBES SURG 16, 1351–1358 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206778663715

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206778663715

Navigation