Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Sports Participation Levels Following Knee Injuries

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there are many published instruments designed to determine outcome following the treatment of knee injuries, only a few incorporate specific assessments of sports activity level and participation into the evaluation. This article reviews 3 of the most commonly used sports activity outcome instruments: the scales devised by Tegner and Lysholm, the Hospital for Special Surgery and the International Knee Documentation Committee. Problems and potential study biases that can arise with improper questionnaire design and data reduction techniques are reviewed, and recommendations are made to correct these problems.

The problems identified include: (i) the failure to precisely define sports activity levels according to a specific sport and intensity of participation; (ii) the failure to sort populations according to overall intensity of athletic participation both before and after treatment; (iii) the failure to detect and sort from the population patients who return to sports and experience significant symptoms; (iv) the combination of work and sports activities into the same scale; and (v) the failure to detect alterations in sports participation caused by changes in lifestyle or non-knee-related factors.

We have developed a sports assessment instrument, the Cincinnati Sports Activity Scale (CSAS). The methodology used to create this scale, its use in the assessment of return to or change in sports activities, and the assessment of specific functions of daily and sports activities, are briefly reviewed. The CSAS is based on 2 criteria: (i) the frequency of participation; and (ii) the general types of forces experienced by the lower extremity during the sport. The assessment of change in sports activities accounts for modifications in lifestyle and can also detect patientswho have returned to sports but are experiencing significant symptoms and problems. Examples of data reduction and reporting are provided to represent practical situations from a prior investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 1985; 198: 43–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanly ST, Warren RF. Arthroscopic meniscectomy in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Arthroscopy 1987; 3 (1): 59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel DM, Anderson AF. Evaluation of treatment results. In: Finerman GAM, Noyes FR, editors. Biology and biomechanics of the traumatized synovial joint: the knee as a model. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1992: 573–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA. A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop 1989; 246: 238–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Noyes FR, Mooar LA, Barber SD. The assessment ofwork-related activities and limitations in knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19: 178–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1999. In press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, Andrews MA. A rigorous comparison between the sexes of results and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (4): 514–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Bone-patellar ligamentbone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A (8): 1125–36

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noyes FR, Barber SD. The effect of an extra-articular procedure on allograft reconstructions for chronic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73A (6): 882–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Barber-Westin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber-Westin, S., Noyes, F.R. Assessment of Sports Participation Levels Following Knee Injuries. Sports Med 28, 1–10 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199928010-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199928010-00001

Keywords

Navigation