Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the Effect of Changes in Body Mass Index on Health State Preferences

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of changes in body mass index (BMI) on health state preferences (HSP).

Design: Multiple regression analysis on pooled data from a clinical study, predicting final HSP as a function of changes in BMI and initial HSP, controlling for age and gender. Subgroup analyses according to clinically relevant subgroups were performed.

Setting: Primary care practice sites.

Patients: 402 obese patients of varying disease severity.

Main outcome measures: BMI was operationalised as (weight in kilograms)/(height in metres)2. HSP were measured directly as visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and converted to time trade-off (TTO) scores.

Results: A one unit decrease in BMI over a 1-year period was associated with a 0.017 gain in utility units (utils). This estimate is comparable to utility gains observed for other widely used treatments (e.g. revascularisation for intermittent claudication, renal transplantation). It varies little over the observed range of VAS to TTO conversion values, and is a conservative estimate compared with using the unconverted VAS scores. If attempts to use weight reduction treatment in only the patients who successfully meet strict weight reduction targets are successful, the gain in HSP experienced by such patients may exceed this estimate. Patients with BMI values ≥28 with hyperglycaemia appear to have the greatest gain in HSP for a given change in BMI over 1 year.

Conclusions: The effect of weight reduction on HSP can be significant, at least in the short term. Estimates of HSP changes presented herein may be useful in economic evaluations of weight reduction treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beirman EL, Hirsch J. Obesity. In: Williams RH, editor. Textbook of endocrinology. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Company, 1981: 906–921

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis MA, Walter H, Neuhaus JM. Obesity and osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence from the National Health Examination Survey (NHANES 1). Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990; 20 (3 Suppl. 1): 34–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mann GV. The influence of obesity on health. Part 1. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 178–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mann GV. The influence of obesity on health. Part 2. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 226–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institutes of Health. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. 1998; NIH Publication #4083 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov [Accessed 2001 Sep 3]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pi-Sunyer FX. Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 655–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Itallie TB. Obesity: adverse effects on health and longevity. Am J Clin Nutr 1979; 32: 2723–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barajas GMA, Robledo ME, Tomas GN, et al. Quality of life in relation to health and obesity in a primary care center. Rev Esp Salud Publica 1998; 72 (3): 221–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fontaine KR, Cheskin LJ, Barofsky I. Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking treatment. J Fam Pract 1996; 43: 265–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontaine KR, Bartlett SJ, Barofsky I. Health-related quality of life among obese persons seeking and not currently seeking treatment. Int J Eat Disord 2000; 27 (1): 101–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Han TS, Tijhuis MA, Lean ME, et al. Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution. Am J Public Health 1998; 88 (12): 1814–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lean ME, Han TS, Seidell JC. Impairment of health and quality of life using new US Federal Guidelines for the Identification of Obesity. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159 (8): 837–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wooley JM, Erder MH, Staten MA. Health related quality of life is lower for obese people [abstract]. Obes Res 1997; 5 Suppl. 1: S87

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart AL, Brook RH. Effects of being overweight. Am J Public Health 1983; 73: 171–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Sjöström L, et al. Swedish obese subjects (SOS) — an intervention study of obesity: baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17: 503–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz DA, McHorney CA, Atkinson RL. Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic illness. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 789–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 Questionnaire. Obes Res 2000; 8 (2): 160–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Choban PS, Onyejekwe J, Burge JC, et al. A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188 (5): 491–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fontaine KR, Barofsky I, Andersen RE, et al. Impact of weight loss on health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999; 8 (3): 275–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Metz JA, Stern JS, Kris-Etherton P, et al. A randomized trial of improved weight loss with a prepared meal plan in overweight and obese patients: impact on cardiovascular risk reduction. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160 (14): 2150–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rippe JM, Price JM, Hess SA, et al. Improved psychological well-being, quality of life, and health practices in moderately overweight women participating in a 12-week structured weight loss program. Obes Res 1998; 6 (3): 208–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rossner S, Sjostrom L, Noack R, et al. Weight loss, weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular risk factors after 2 years treatment with orlistat for obesity. Obes Res 2000; 8 (1): 49–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stenius-Aarniala B, Poussa T, Kvarnstrom J, et al. Immediate and long term effects ofweight reduction in obese people with asthma: randomised controlled study. BMJ 2000; 320 (7238): 827–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Gemert WG, Severeijns RM, Greve JW, et al. Psychological functioning of morbidly obese patients after surgical treatment. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22 (5): 393–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Gemert WG, Adang EM, Greve JW, et al. Quality of life assessment of morbidly obese patients: effect of weight-reducing surgery. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67 (2): 197–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fine JT, Colditz GA, Coakley EH, et al. A prospective study of weight change and health-related quality of life in women. JAMA 1999; 282 (22): 2136–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wadden TA, Steen SN, Wingate BJ, et al. Psychosocial consequences of weight reduction: how much weight loss is enough? Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 63: S461–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Erickson P, Smiciklas-Wright H, Friedmann JM, et al. Association between body mass index and health-related quality of life in older adults [abstract]. Qual Life Res 2000; 9 (3): 329

    Google Scholar 

  29. Macran S, Kind P, Farina C. Health-related quality of life in obesity: results from a English population study [abstract]. Qual Life Res 2000; 9 (3): 323

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hakim Z, Howard P, Farina C. Estimating health state preferences in obesity [abstract]. Qual Life Res 2000; 9 (3): 323

    Google Scholar 

  31. Foxcroft DR, Milne R. Orlistat for the treatment of obesity: rapid review and cost-effectiveness model. Obes Rev 2000; 1: 121–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hauptman J, Lucas C, Boldrin MN, et al. Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 160–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathias SD, Williamson CL, Colwell HH, et al. Assessing health-related quality-of-life and health state preference in persons with obesity: a validation study. Qual Life Res 1997; 6 (4): 311–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 1996; 34: 702–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stiggelbout AM, Eijkemans MJC, Kiebert GM, et al. The ‘Utility’ of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment: is it an alternative to the time tradeoff? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996; 12 (2): 291–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 1986; 5: 1–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Guide to design and development of health state utility instrumentation. Working paper 90-9. Ontario: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  38. Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, et al., editors. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  39. Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life: a review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17 (2): 151–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioecon Plann Sci 1976; 10: 129–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boyle MH, Torrance GW, Sinclair JC, et al. Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very low birth weight infants. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1330–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. De Haes JCJM, De Koning HJ, Van Oortmarssen GJ, et al. The impact of a breast cancer screening programme on quality-adjusted life-years. Int J Cancer 1991; 49: 538–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res 1982; 30 (6): 1043–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Hout B, Bonsel G, Habbema JDF, et al. Heart transplantation in The Netherlands: cost effects and scenarios. J Health Econ 1993; 12: 73–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W. Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 2001; 21 (4): 329–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dolan P. Effect of age on health state valuations. J Health Serv Res Policy 2000; 5 (1): 17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences III: population and context effects. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 585–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Leary JF, Fairclough DL, Jankowski MK, et al. Comparison of time tradeoff utilities and rating scale values of cancer patients and their relatives: evidence for a possible plateau relationship. Med Decis Making 1995; 15 (2): 132–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Krabbe PFM, Essink-Bot M, Bonsel GJ. The comparability and reliability of five health state valuation methods. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45 (11): 1641–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patrick D, Erickson P, editors. Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bosch JL, Hunink MGM. Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 591–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 235–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, et al. The time tradeoff method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 1996; 5 (2): 141–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Lei Peng, M.S. and Christopher M. Barker, Ph.D. for statistical and programming assistance. The helpful comments from three anonymous reviewers are also acknowledged. This study was funded by Roche Pharmaceuticals and was presented in part at the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Quality of Life Research, Vancouver, Canada, October 29–31, 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zafar Hakim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakim, Z., Wolf, A. & Garrison, L.P. Estimating the Effect of Changes in Body Mass Index on Health State Preferences. Pharmacoeconomics 20, 393–404 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220060-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220060-00004

Keywords

Navigation