Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011
Dispatch

Chikungunya Virus, Southeastern France

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
376
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (M. Grandadam, V. Caro, J.-M. Thiberge, A.-B. Failloux, P. Desprès); Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Marseille, France (S. Plumet, H.J. Tolou, I. Leparc-Goffart); Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint-Maurice, France (Y. Souarès); Private Consulting Rooms, Saint-Raphaël, France (M. Budelot, D. Cosserat)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In September 2010, autochthonous transmission of chikungunya virus was recorded in southeastern France, where the Aedes albopictus mosquito vector is present. Sequence analysis of the viral genomes of imported and autochthonous isolates indicated new features for the potential emergence and spread of the virus in Europe.

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV; Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus), transmitted to humans by the bite of Aedes spp. mosquito, leads to an acute fever associated with an arthromyalgic syndrome (1). CHIKV outbreaks occurred after the virus’s recent expansion in Africa, the Indian Ocean, India, and Southeast Asia. Phylogenetic analyses have demonstrated 3 distinct lineages of CHIKV strains: West Africa, Asia, and East/Central/South Africa (ECSA) (2,3). Strains from the Indian Ocean and India segregate into 2 independent sublineages that presumably derive from an East African ancestral genotype (2,3). Until recently, the Ae. aegypti mosquito was widely accepted as the main urban vector of CHIKV. However, the Ae. albopictus mosquito was extensively implicated in CHIKV transmission during the 2005–06 outbreak in Réunion Island (1).

The Study

Reinforced surveillance systems aimed at monitoring the introduction of CHIKV have been implemented in 6 departments in southeastern France, including the Var department, where Ae. albopictus has spread since its introduction in 2004, presumably from northern Italy (4). On August 29, 2010, a 7-year-old girl (patient 1) with acute febrile syndrome, headache, and abdominal pain sought treatment in the city of Fréjus (Var) 1 day after she had returned from Rajasthan, India. Continuous CHIKV circulation in northern India districts has been reported during 2009–2010 (www.promedmail.org). The patient’s serum sample was found positive for CHIKV infection by reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) (5,6). Three weeks after the notification of patient 1, another young girl (patient 2) experienced clinical symptoms that began on September 18 with fever, arthralgia, backache, headache, and retro-orbital pain. Patient 2 had no history of travel in areas endemic for CHIKV. She resided 2.5 km from patient 1. The serum specimen was positive for CHIKV diagnosis. Patient 2’s physician reported that a young girl (patient 3), a close friend of her patient, showed clinical symptoms compatible with CHIKV infection at the same time. Patient 3, who lives near patient 1, had invited patient 2 to spend the night of September 15 at her home. The 2 children reported numerous mosquito bites. A serum sample from patient 3 was collected 1 week after onset of fever and monoclonal antibody capture ELISA detected high titers of specific anti-CHIKV immunoglobulin M. The serum sample also showed a weak RT-PCR signal for CHIKV. Given that patients 2 and 3 did not report any recent travel to areas endemic for CHIKV, their illnesses were classified as autochthonous cases of CHIKV infection. No complications were recorded, but all 3 patients had persistent weakness and joint pain 3 months after the acute phase.

High densities of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes have been found in the Var department since 2008. Intensive mosquito control measures, including spraying for adult mosquitoes and destroying breeding sites, were undertaken around the patients’ residences and areas visited by confirmed case-patients. No further cases were found by the active case finding system (a local physician and laboratories network) implemented for 45 days after the declaration of the last autochthonous case.

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic relationships among chikungunya virus isolates from cases of chikungunya fever in France, based on complete E2-6K-E1 nucleotide sequence (2,771 nt) analysis. Gray shading indicates imported and autochthonous strains. Sequence alignments were performed by using BioNumerics version 5.1 (www.applied-maths.com). Phylogenetic analysis was inferred by using the maximum-likelihood method as implemented in MEGA version 5 software (www.megasoftware.net). Bootstrap support values

Figure. Phylogenetic relationships among chikungunya virus isolates from cases of chikungunya fever in France, based on complete E2-6K-E1 nucleotide sequence (2,771 nt) analysis. Gray shading indicates imported and autochthonous strains. Sequence alignments...

A molecular study of France/2010 CHIKV strains isolated in Fréjus obtained from patients 1 (imported case) and 2 (autochthonous case) was performed. Viral genomic RNA was extracted from CHIKV grown once in mosquito C6/36 cells and then subjected to RT-PCR amplification by using a set of primers targeting the structural genes of CHIKV (7). Paired sequence analysis of the E2–6K–E1 junction showed that the 2 France/2010 CHIKV strains display a divergence rate <0.05% at the nucleotide level, whereas 100% identity was observed at the amino acid level. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that these viral strains belong to a cluster that is closely related to strains from India within the ECSA lineage (Figure). The France/2010 CHIKV isolate from patient 2 might be derived from an Indian strain introduced by patient 1 (index case). Genotypes E2-211T, E2-312M, E2-386A, 6K-8I, and E1-284E that are found in the currently circulating strains belonging to the ECSA lineage were identified in France/2010 CHIKV isolates (2,3,7). These isolates also display the genotype E1-211E specifically shared by viral strains belonging to the Asian phylogenetic group (Table). The residue Ala at position E2-264 has not been previously described in any CHIKV strains.

Recent attention has focused on the predominant role of E1 and E2 proteins in successful CHIKV infection of the anthropophilic Ae. albopictus (2,3,7,8). Vector competence experiments with La Réunion/2006 CHIKV isolates demonstrated the importance of the newly acquired E1-Ala226Val substitution for efficient transmission by Ae. albopictus mosquitoes during the 2006 outbreak in Réunion Island (710). Italy/2007 CHIKV strains also exhibited the signature E1-226V genotype (11). Ae. albopictus from northern Italy and from southeastern France showed disseminated infection rates ranging from 75%–90% for CHIKV strains with E1-226V (10). The 2 France/2010 CHIKV strains isolated in Fréjus have Ala at position E1-226 (Table). The presence of an Asp residue at position E2-60, found in most of the ECSA CHIKV strains, may in part counterbalance the less favorable transmission of E1-226A strain in Ae. albopictus (Table). The Thr residue at position E2-211 potentiates the infectivity of CHIKV in Ae. albopictus mosquitoes only in synergy with E1-226V. The presence of E2-211T in CHIKV isolates from France underlines the risk for emergence of a fully adapted viral variant if the E1-226V genotype was selected during continuous transmission within Ae. albopictus populations in France (7,8,9).

Conclusions

The efficient CHIKV transmission in Italy and southeastern France sheds new light on its dissemination potential in Europe from 1 index case, regardless of the viral genetic background and mosquito species in the region of origin of the imported CHIKV (1,10,11). In emerging regions, such as Italy and Réunion Island, where the seroprevalence in the population was <50%, no confirmed cases were recorded for years after an outbreak. Italy has not reported any new autochthonous cases since 2007. However, >2 years passed since the end of the epidemic in Réunion Island before a local transmission of CHIKV was again detected. In Europe where sylvatic cycles are absent, vertical transmission may participate in the maintenance and/or cyclic reemergences of CHIKV. This critical issue remains to be investigated in diapausing temperate populations of Ae. albopictus that may have more efficient vertical transmission than mosquito populations in eastern Italy and tropical regions (11,12).

In 2010, southeastern France faced the concomitant emergences of dengue virus (DENV) and CHIKV (13). For each of these viruses, only 2 autochthonous infections were confirmed, which suggests that rapid detection and control measures implemented around imported and autochthonous cases have been efficient. A recent report mentioned the dual emergence of CHIKV and DENV in southeastern France and urged the implementation of specific surveillance and response measures to reduce the risk for arbovirus emergence (14). Since 2006, a specific chikungunya/dengue national preparation and response plan based on rapid detection and investigation of imported and suspected autochthonous cases, mosquito control measures, and efficiency evaluation in the treated areas has been activated from May through November and then modified after annual debriefing meetings involving all partners. In 2010, this model proved to be well adapted to the early detection and control of CHIKV and DENV. Considering the expanding global distribution of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes and the successful emergence of CHIKV in Italy and France, reinforced surveillance and response to CHIKV and DENV dissemination should become a higher priority in Europe (15).

Mr Grandadam is a senior medical virologist, associate director of the National Reference Centre for arboviruses. His research interests are human and animal arthropod-borne virus diagnosis and comprehensive studies on transmission cycles and virus-vector relationships.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Marie-Pascale Frenkiel, Isabelle Moltini, Charlotte Foret, and Patrick Gravier for technical assistance. We are also grateful to Richard Paul, Aileen Baldwin-Plate, and Hans Gad for helpful discussion and manuscript revision.

Financial support for this study was received from the French Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint Maurice, France.

Top

References

  1. Schwartz  O, Albert  ML. Biology and pathogenesis of chikungunya virus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:491500. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Volk  SM, Chen  R, Tsetsarkin  KA, Adams  AP, Garcia  TI, Sall  AA, Genome-scale phylogenetic analyses of chikungunya virus reveal independent emergences of recent epidemics and various evolutionary rates. J Virol. 2010;84:6497504. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hapuarachchi  HC, Bandara  KB, Sumanadasa  SD, Hapugoda  MD, Lai  YL, Lee  KS, Re-emergence of chikungunya virus in Southeast Asia: virological evidence from Sri Lanka and Singapore. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:106776. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schaffner  F, Karch  S. First report of Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1984) in metropolitan France. C R Acad Sci III. 2000;323:3735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Peyrefitte  CN, Rousset  D, Pastorino  BA, Pouillot  R, Bessaud  M, Tock  F, Chikungunya virus, Cameroon, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:76871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pastorino  B, Bessaud  M, Grandadam  M, Murri  S, Tolou  HJ, Peyrefitte  CN. Development of a TaqMan RT-PCR assay without RNA extraction step for the detection and quantification of African chikungunya viruses. J Virol Methods. 2005;124:6571. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schuffenecker  I, Iteman  I, Michault  A, Murri  S, Frangeul  L, Vaney  MC, Genome microevolution of chikungunya viruses causing the Indian Ocean outbreak. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e263. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsetsarkin  KA, Vanlandingham  DL, McGee  CE, Higgs  S. A single mutation in chikungunya virus affects vector specificity and epidemic potential. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsetsarkin  KA, McGee  CE, Volk  SM, Vanlandingham  DL, Weaver  SC, Higgs  S. Epistatic roles of E2 glycoprotein mutations in adaption of chikungunya virus to Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6835. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vazeille  M, Moutailler  S, Coudrier  D, Rousseaux  C, Khun  H, Huerre  M, Two chikungunya isolates from the outbreak of La Reunion (Indian Ocean) exhibit different patterns of infection in the mosquito, Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1168. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rezza  G, Nicoletti  L, Angelini  R, Romi  R, Finarelli  AC, Panning  M, Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet. 2007;370:18406. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vazeille  M, Mousson  L, Failloux  AB. Failure to demonstrate experimental vertical transmission of the epidemic strain of chikungunya virus in Aedes albopictus from La Réunion Island, Indian Ocean. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:6325. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. La Ruche  G, Souarès  Y, Armengaud  A, Peloux-Petiot  F, Delaunay  P, Desprès  P, First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould  EA, Gallian  P, De Lamballerie  X, Charrel  RN. First cases of autochthonous dengue fever and chikungunya fever in France: from bad dream to reality! Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:17024. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Weaver  SC, Reisen  WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:32845. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.101873

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marc Grandadam, Interactions Moléculaires Flavivirus Hôtes and Centre National de Référence des Arbovirus, Institut Pasteur, 25 Rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 14, 2011
Page updated: August 14, 2011
Page reviewed: August 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external