A Clustering Approach to Segmenting Users of Internet-based Risk Calculators

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: Risk calculators are widely available Internet applications that deliver quantitative health risk estimates to consumers. Although these tools are known to have varying effects on risk perceptions, little is known about who will be more likely to accept objective risk estimates.

Objective: To identify clusters of online health consumers that help explain variation in individual improvement in risk perceptions from web-based quantitative disease risk information.

Methods: A secondary analysis was performed on data collected in a field experiment that measured people’s pre-diabetes risk perceptions before and after visiting a realistic health promotion website that provided quantitative risk information. K-means clustering was performed on numerous candidate variable sets, and the different segmentations were evaluated based on between-cluster variation in risk perception improvement.

Results: Variation in responses to risk information was best explained by clustering on pre-intervention absolute pre-diabetes risk perceptions and an objective estimate of personal risk. Members of a high-risk overesti-mater cluster showed large improvements in their risk perceptions, but clusters of both moderate-risk and high-risk underestimaters were much more muted in improving their optimistically biased perceptions.

Conclusions: Cluster analysis provided a unique approach for segmenting health consumers and predicting their acceptance of quantitative disease risk information. These clusters suggest that health consumers were very responsive to good news, but tended not to incorporate bad news into their self-perceptions much. These findings help to quantify variation among online health consumers and may inform the targeted marketing of and improvements to risk communication tools on the Internet.

• References

• 1 Lipkus IM, Hollands J. The visual communication of risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 1999; 25: 149-163.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Waters EA, Sullivan HW, Nelson W, Hesse BW. What is my cancer risk? How internet-based cancer risk assessment tools convey individualized risk estimates to the public: Content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2009; 11 (03) e33.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Levy A, Sonnad S, Kurichi J, Sherman M, Armstrong K. Making sense of cancer risk calculators on the web. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 229-235.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making 2007; 27: 696-713.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Emmons K, Wong M, Puleo E, Weinstein N, Fletcher R, Colditz G. Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: Correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Comm 2004; 9: 127-141.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Harle C, Padman R, Downs J. The impact of web-based diabetes risk calculators on information processing and risk perceptions. In: Proceedings of the 2008 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Symposium. Washington, D. C.: 2008
  Google Scholar
• 7 Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jancovic A, Lucas T, Fagerlin A. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling 2008; 73: 448-455.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Education Research 1996; 11: 97-105.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, Wahrenberger JW, Ross JM. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1993; 8: 543-548.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 McNeil B, Pauker S, Sox H, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 1259-1262.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Weinstein N, Atwood K, Puleo E, Fletcher R, Colditz G, Emmons K. Colon cancer: Risk perceptions and risk communication. J Health Comm 2004; 9: 53-65.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Derry HA, McClure JB, Stark A, Pitsch R, Fagerlin A. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: The debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Education and Counseling 2008; 73: 209-214.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Avis NE, Smith KW, McKinlay JB. Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: What influences perceptions and can they be changed?. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1608-1612.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Senay I, Kaphingst KA. Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk. Medical Decision Making 2009; 29: 193-201.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Cull A, Anderson E, Campbell S, Steel M. The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. British Journal of Cancer 1999; 79: 501-508.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Gurmankin AD, Domchek S, Stopfer J, Fels C, Armstrong K. Patients’ resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 523-529.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Helmes AW, Culver JO, Bowen DJ. Results of a randomized study of telephone versus in-person breast cancer risk counseling. Patient Education and Counseling 2006; 64: 96-103.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, Daly M, Miller S, Sands C, Balshem A. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995; 87: 286-292.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Meiser B, Halliday JL. What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine 2002; 54: 1463-1470.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lobb EA, Butow PN, Meiser B, Barratt A, Gaff C, Young MA, Kirk J, Gattas M, Gleeson M, Tucker K. Women’s preferences and consultants’ communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: Impact on patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Genetics 2003; 40: e56-e56.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Kreuter MW, Farrell D, Skinner C, Jacobsen H. Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication using computer technology. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 22 Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Education and Counseling 2005; 57: 294-299.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Peters E, Vastfjall D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazzocco K, Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science 2006; 17: 407-413.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Harle CA, Downs JS, Padman R. Designing a personalized health risk communication website to motivate user attention and systematic processing. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS. Paris, France: 2008
  Google Scholar
• 25 Han PKJ, Klein WMP, Lehman TC, Masset H, Lee SC, Freedman AN. Laypersons’ responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates. Medical Decision Making 2009; 29: 391-403.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 American Diabetes Association.. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: S4-41.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, Eberhardt MS, Flegal KM, Engelgau MM, Saydah SH, Williams DE, Geiss LS, Gregg EW. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U. S. Population: National health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1263-1268.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Walker EA, Mertz CK, Kalten MR, Flynn J. Risk perceptions for developing diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 26: 2543-2548.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Adriaanse MC, Snoek FJ, Dekker JM, Spijkerman AMW, Nijpels G, van der Ploeg HM, Heine RJ. Perceived risk for type 2 diabetes in participants in a stepwise population-screening programme. Diabetic Medicine 2003; 20: 210-215.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Fisher EB, Walker EA, Bostrom A, Fischhoff B, Haire-Joshu D, Johnson SB. Behavioral science research in the prevention of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 599-606.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Harle CA. Doctoral dissertation: Essays on the design and evaluation of information technology-enabled interventions for chronic disease risk assessment and communication. In: The H John Heinz III College. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 32 Weinstein N, Kwitel A, McCaul KD, Magnan RE, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX. Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccine. Health Psychology 2007; 26: 146-151.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington J. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2004; 27: 125-130.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990
  Google Scholar
• 35 Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 2001; 63: 411-423.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Gower J. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 1971; 623-637.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 R Development Core Team.. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 38 Fox S. Online health search 2006, Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2006 Available at: www.pewinternet.org Accessed: December 9 2009
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Weinstein ND, Klein WM. Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychology 1995; 14: 132-140.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Welch HG. Women’s perceptions of breast cancer risk: How you ask matters. Medical Decision Making 1999; 19: 221-229.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar