Abstract
This research was supported by a Pioneer grant from the Netherlands Visual attention can be divided over multiple objects or locations. However, there is no single theoretical framework within which the effects of dividing attention can be interpreted. In order to develop such a model, here we manipulated the stage of visual processing at which attention was divided, while simultaneously probing the costs of dividing attention on two dimensions. We show that dividing attention incurs dissociable time and precision costs, which depend on whether attention is divided duringmonitoring or duringaccess. Dividing attention during monitoring resulted in progressively delayed access to attended locations as additional locations were monitored, as well as a one-off precision cost. When dividing attention during access, time costs were systematically lower at one of the accessed locations than at the other, indicating that divided attention during access, in fact, involves rapid sequential allocation of undivided attention. We propose a model in whichdivided attention is understood as the simultaneous parallel preparation and subsequent sequential execution of multiple shifts ofundivided attention. This interpretation has the potential to bring together diverse findings from both the divided-attention and saccade preparation literature and provides a framework within which to integrate the broad spectrum of divided-attention methodologies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, G. A., &Cavanagh, P. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields.Psychological Science,16, 637–643.
Awh, E., &Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 834–846.
Bahrami, B. (2003). Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking.Visual Cognition,10, 949–963.
Baldauf, D., &Deubel, H. (2008). Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades.Experimental Brain Research,184, 411–425.
Bichot, N. P., Cave, K. R., &Pashler, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 403–423.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision,10, 433–436.
Broadbent, D. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Carlson, T. A., Hogendoorn, H., &Verstraten, F. A. J. (2006). The speed of visual attention: What time is it?Journal of Vision,6, 1406–1411.
Castet, E., Jeanjean, S., Montagnini, A., Laugier, D., &Masson, G. S. (2006). Dynamics of attentional deployment during saccadic programming.Journal of Vision,6, 196–212.
Castiello, U., &Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
Cavanagh, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception.Science,257, 1563–1565.
Cavanagh, P., &Alvarez, A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 349–354.
Deubel, H. (2008). The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.Psychological Research,72, 630–640.
Duncan, J. (1980a). The demonstration of capacity limitation.Cognitive Psychology,12, 75–96.
Duncan, J. (1980b). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Filali-Sadouk, N., Castet, E., Olivier, E., &Zenon, A. (2010). Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.Journal of Vision,10(4, Art. 21), 1–13.
Gobell, J. L., Tseng, C. H., &Sperling, G. (2004). The spatial distribution of visual attention.Vision Research,44, 1273–1296.
Godijn, R., &Theeuwes, J. (2003). Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 882–896.
Hogendoorn, H., Carlson, T. A., &Verstraten, F. A. J. (2007). The time course of attentive tracking.Journal of Vision,7(14, Art. 2), 1–10.
Huang, L., &Pashler, H. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,114, 599–631.
Hunt, A. R., &Cavanagh, P. (2009). Looking ahead: The perceived direction of gaze shifts before the eyes move.Journal of Vision,9(9, Art. 1), 1–7.
Intriligator, J., &Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention.Cognitive Psychology,43, 171–216.
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., &Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades.Vision Research,35, 1897–1916.
Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
Libet, B. (2004).Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCormick, P. A., Klein, R. M., &Johnston, S. (1998). Splitting versus sharing focal attention: Comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 350–357.
McMains, S. A., &Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex.Neuron,42, 677–686.
Montagnini, A., &Castet, E. (2007). Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual attention during saccade preparation: Independence and coupling between attention and movement planning.Journal of Vision,7(14, Art. 8), 1–16.
Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of the scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.),The encyclopedia of the neurobiology of attention (pp. 251–256). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect.Current Directions in Psychological Science,4, 118–123.
Pashler, H. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision,10, 437–442.
Phillips, W. A., &Christie, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 117–133.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., &Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Spatial Vision,3, 179–197.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., &Feldman, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking.Cognition,80, 159–177.
Shiffrin, R. M., Gardner, G. T., &Allmeyer, D. H. (1973). On the degree of attention and capacity limitations in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 231–236.
Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,25, 168–199.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Trick, L., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). Subitizing and the FINST spatial index model [Abstract].Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 490.
VanRullen, R., Carlson, T. A., &Cavanagh, P. (2007). The blinking spotlight of attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,104, 19204–19209.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?Psychological Science,9, 33–39.
Wundt, W. M. (1883).Philosophische studien. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization.Cognitive Psychology,24, 295–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Pioneer grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) to F.A.J.V.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogendoorn, H., Carlson, T.A., Vanrullen, R. et al. Timing divided attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 2059–2068 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196683
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196683