Abstract
The effect of orientation upon face recognition was explored in two experiments, which used a procedure adapted from the mental rotation literature. In the first experiment, a linear increase in the RT of same-different judgments was found as the second of a pair of sequentially presented faces was rotated away from the vertical. Also, it was found that the effect of changing facial expression did not interact with orientation. In the second experiment, a linear relationship between RT and orientation was found in a task involving the recognition of famous faces. This recognition task was found to be more affected by inversion than was an expression classification task. These results are interpreted as evidence against the view that inverted faces are processed in a qualitatively different manner from upright faces, and are also inconsistent with the hypothesis that inversion makes faces difficult to recognize because facial expression cannot be extracted from an inverted face.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 105–116.
Bruce, V., Valentine, T., &Baddeley, A. (1987). The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,1, 109–120
Bruce, V., &Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.
Carey, S., &Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.Science,195, 312–314.
Cochran, E. L., Pick, A. D., &Pick, H. L. (1983). Task-specific strategies of mental “rotation” of facial representations.Memory & Cognition,11, 41–48.
Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 20–43.
Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special An effect of expertise.Journal of Experiment Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
Flin, R. H. (1985) Development of face recognition: An encoding switch?British Journal of Psychology,76, 123–134.
Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory.Journal of Psychology,105, 47–59.
Johnson, N. L., &Leone, F. C. (1964).Statistics and experimental design. In engineering and the physical sciences. New York Wiley.
Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures of the behavioral sciences (lst ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA Brooks/Cole.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery. A theory.Psychological Review,88, 46–66.
Maruyama, K., &Endo, M. (1983). The effect of face orientation upon apparent direction of gaze.Tohoku Psychologica Folia,42, 126–138.
Maruyama, K., &Endo, M. (1984). Illusory face dislocation effect and configural integration in the inverted face.Tohoku Psychologica Folia,43, 150–160.
McKelvie, S. J. (1983). Effects of lateral reversal on recognition memory for photographs of faces.British Journal of Psychology,74, 391–407
Metzler, J., &Shepard, R. N. (1974) Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories of cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 147–201). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Parkin, A. J., &Goodwin, E. (1983). The influence of different processing strategies on the recognition of transformed and untransformed faces.Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 272–277
Parks, T. E., Coss, R. G., &Coss, C. S. (1985). Thatcher arid the Cheshire cat: Context and the processing of facial features.Perception,14, 747–754.
Phillips, R. J. (1979). Some exploratory experiments on memory for photographs of faces.Acta Psychologica,43, 39–56.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review,88, 16–45.
Rock, I. (1973).Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
Rock, I. (1974). The perception of disoriented figures.Scientific American,230, 78–85.
Scapinello, K. F., &Yarmey, A. D. (1970). The role of familiarity and onentaUon in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli.Psychonomic Science,21, 329–330.
Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception.British Journal of Psychology,75, 221–242.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher—A new illusion.Perception,9, 483–484
Valentine, T. (1986).Encoding processes m face recognition. Doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, England.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1985). What’s up? The Margaret Thatcher illusion revisited.Perception,14, 515–516.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61, 259–273.
Yarmey, A. D. (1971). Recognition memory for famdiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay.Psychonomic Science,24, 286–288.
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.
Yin, R. K. (1970). Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability?Neuropsychologia,8, 395–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valentine, T., Bruce, V. Mental rotation of faces. Memory & Cognition 16, 556–566 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197057
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197057