Abstract
This experiment demonstrates the influence of the prior presentation of visual scenes on the identification of briefly presented drawings of real-world objects. Different pairings of objects and scenes were used to produce three main contextual conditions: appropriate, inappropriate, and no context. Correct responses and confusions with visually similar objects depended strongly on both the contextual condition and the particular target object presented. The probability of being correct was highest in the appropriate context condition and lowest in the inappropriate context condition. Confidence ratings of responses were a function of the perceptual similarity between the stimulus object and the named object; they were not strongly affected by contextual conditions. Morton’s (1970) “logogen” model provided a good quantitative fit to the response probability data.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biederman, I. Perceiving real world scenes. Science, 1972, 177, 77–80.
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L. & Stacy, E. W. Searching for objects in real world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 22–27.
Bruner, J. S. On preceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 123–152.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: Critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 335–359.
Luce, R. D.Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley, 1959.
Morton, J. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 165–178.
Morton, J. A functional model for memory, In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Norman, D. A. Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 522–536.
Palmer, S. E. Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman, D. E. Rumelhart, & the LNR Resev.rch Group, Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, in press.
Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 275–280.
Rosch, E. H. Universals and culture specifics in human categorization. In R. Brislin, S. Bochner, & W. Lonner (Eds.),Cross-cultural perspectives on learning. Sage Press, in press.
Rumelhart, D. E. A multicomponent theory of confusions among briefly exposed alphabetic characters. Perception & Psychophysics, in press.
Rumelhart, D. E., and Siple, P. A. The process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 99–118.
Tulving, E., & Gold, C. Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 319–327.
Tulving, E., Mandler, G. & Baumel, R. Interaction of two sources of information in tachistoscopic word recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1964, 18, 62–71.
Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 59–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a Graduate Fellowship from the National Science Foundation to the author and by Research Grants NS-07454-07 from the National Institute of Health and GB-32235 from the National Science Foundation to Donald A. Norman.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, t.E. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition 3, 519–526 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197524
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197524