Abstract
Male and female subjects with normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity and less than .25 diopter of corrected astigmatism were asked to make contrast threshold judgments in response to both stationary and drifting grating displays. Results indicate a sex difference in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency for vertical and oblique orientations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
1. Ross, H. E., & Woodhouse, J. M. Genetic factors in orientation anisotropy. Manuscript in preparation.
2. Johansson, G.A note on differences in motion track enlargement between male and female subjects. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Stockholm, 1955,24.
References
Appelle, S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique” effect in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin, 1972,78, 266–278.
Attneave, F., &Olson, R. Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74,149–157
Blakemore, C. &Campbell, F. W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retina: images.Journal of Physiology. 1969,203, 237–260.
Burg, A. Visual acuity as measured by dynamic and static tests: A comparative evaluation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966,50,460–466.
Buhg, A., &Hulbert, S. Dynamic visual acuity as related to age, sex and static acuity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961,45, 111–116.
Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F., &Enroth-Cugell, C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat.Journal of Physiology, 1969,203, 223–235.
Campbell, F. W., &Green, D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.Journal of Physiology (London), 1965,181,576–593.
Campbell, F. W., &Kulikowski, J. J. Orientational selectivity of the human visual system.Journal of Physiology, 1966,187, 437–445.
Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., &Levinson, J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.Journal of Physiology, 1966,187, 427–436.
Campbell, F. W., &Robson, J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.Journal of Physiology, 1968,197,551–556.
Emsley, H. H. Irregular astigmatism of the eye: Effect of correcting lenses.Transactions of the Optical Society, 1925,27. 28–41.
Enroth-Cugell, C. &Robson, J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat.Journal of Physiology (London), 1966,187, 517–552.
Finger, F. W., &Spelt, D. K. The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1947,37, 243–250.
Ginsburg, A.Psychological correlates of a model of the human visual system. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, 1971.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.Journal of Physiology (London), 1962,160,106–154.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965,28, 229–289.
Ikeda, H., &Wright, M. J. Evidence for sustained and transient neurones in the cat’s visual cortex.Vision Research, 1974,14, 133–136. (a)
Ikeda, H., &Wright, M. J. The relationship between the “sustained-transient” and the “simple-complex” classifications of neurones in area 17 of the cat.Physiological Society, 1974,9, 59–60. (b)
Immergluck, L., &Mearini, M. Age and sex differences in responses to embedded figures and reversible figures.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1969,8, 210–211.
Jastrow, J. On the judgment of angles and positions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1893,5, 214–248.
McGuinness, D. Away from a unisex psychology: Individual differences in visual sensory and perceptual processes.Perception, 1976,5, 279–294.
McGuinness, D., &Lewis, I. Sex differences in visual persistence: Experiments on the Ganzfeld and afterimages.Perception, 1976,5,295–301.
McGuinness, D., &Pribram, K. H. The origins of sensory bias in the development of gender differences in perception and cognition. In M. Bortner (Ed.),Cognitive growth and development: Essays in memory of Herbert G. Birch. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1979.
Nachmias, J., Sachs, M. B., &Robson, J. G. Independent spatial frequency channels in human vision.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1969,59, 1538A.
Ogilvie, J. C. &Taylor, M. M. Effect of orientation of the v sibility of fine wires.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1958,48,628–629.
Pohl, W., &Caldwell, W. Toward the analysis of a functional deficit.Journal of General Psychology, 1968,79,241–255.
Roberts, J.Binocular visual acuity of adults. Washington, D.C: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1964.
Sekuler, R. Spatial vision.Annual Review of Psychology, 1974,24,195–232.
Vassilev, A., &Mitov, D. Perception time and spatial frequency.Vision Research, 1976,16, 89–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SED78-17362) to Dr. Karl Pribram.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brabyn, L.B., McGuinness, D. Gender differences in response to spatial frequency and stimulus orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 26, 319–324 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199887
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199887