Abstract
Completion of partly occluded objects is a ubiquitous phenomenon in human visual perception. It is unclear, however, whether it occurs at all in other species: Studies on visual discrimination learning have revealed that animals usually attend to parts and features of the discriminative stimuli rather than to global object properties. We provide here the first demonstration of recognition of partly occluded objects in a bird species, the domestic chickGallus gallus, using the naturalistic setting made available by filial imprinting, a process whereby young birds form attachments to their mothers or some artificial substitute. In Experiment 1, newborn chicks were reared singly with a red cardboard triangle, to which they rapidly imprinted and therefore treated as a social partner. On Day 3 of life, the chicks were presented with pairs of objects composed of either isolated fragments or occluded parts of the imprinting stimulus. Chicks consistently chose to associate with complete or with partly occluded versions of the imprinting object rather than with separate fragments of it. Similarly, in Experiment 2, chicks reared with a partly occluded triangle chose to associate with a complete triangle rather than with a fragmented one, whereas chicks reared with a fragmented triangle chose to associate with a fragmented triangle and not with a complete one. Newborn chicks thus appear to behave as if they could experience amodal completion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew, R. J. (1991). The chick in experiment: Techniques and tests. General. In R. J. Andrew (Ed.),Neural and behavioural plasticity (pp. 6–11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bateson, P. P. G. (1991). Filial imprinting: Measuring preference and differential responsiveness. InR. J. Andrew (Ed.),Neural and behavioural plasticity (pp. 12–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bolhuis, J. J. (1991). Mechanisms of avian imprinting: A review.Biological Reviews,66, 303–345.
Bower, T. G. R. (1967). Phenomenal identity and form perception in an infant.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 74–76.
Bradshaw, R. H. (1991). Discrimination of group members by laying hens Gallus domesticus.Behavioural Processes,24, 43–151.
Bravo, M., Blake, R., &Morrison, S. (1988). Cats see subjective contours.Vision Research,28, 861–865.
Candland, D. K. (1969). Discriminability of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social order.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,69, 281–285.
Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon’s analysis of pictures.Pattern Recognition,12, 1–6.
DeWeerd, P., Vandenbussche, E., De Bruyn, B., &Orban, G. A. (1990). Illusory contour orientation discrimination in the cat.Behavioural Brain Research,39, 1–17.
Hodos, W. (1993). The visual capabilities of birds. In H. P. Zeigler & H.-J. Bishof (Eds.),Vision, brain, and behaviour in birds (pp.63–766). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horn, G. (1985).Memory, imprinting, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Ingle, D. (1978). Mechanisms of shape-recognition among vertebrates. In R. Held, H. W. Leibovitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology VIII (pp. 259–287). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Johnson, M. H., &Horn, G. (1987). The role of a restricted region of the chick forebrain in the recognition of individual conspecifics.Behavioural Brain Research,23, 269–275.
Johnson, M. H., &Morton, J. (1991).Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognition. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.
Kanizsa, G., Renzi, P., Conte, S., Compostela, C., &Guerani, L. (1993). Amodal completion in mouse vision.Perception,22, 713–721.
Karten, H. J., &Shimizu, T. (1989). The origins of neocortex: Connections and laminations as distinct events in evolution.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 291–301.
Kellman, P. J., &Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–221.
Kellman, P. J., &Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy.Cognitive Psychology,15, 483–524.
Koehler, W.(1947).Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Lorenz, K. (1937). The companion in the bird’s world.Auk,54, 245–273.
Michotte,A. (1963).The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
Michotte, A., Thinés, G., &Crabbé, G. (1964). Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives [Amodal complements of perceptual structures]. Louvain, Belgium: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.
Peterhans, E., &von der Heydt, R. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: II. Contours bridging gaps.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1749–1763.
Redies, C., Crook, J. M., &Creutzfeldt, O. D. (1986). Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.Experimental Brain Research,61, 469–481.
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., &Zanforlin, M. (1994). Perceptual and motivational aspects of detour behaviour in young chicks.Animal Behaviour,47, 123–131.
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., &Zanforlin, M. (1995). Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks.Animal Behaviour,49, 195–199.
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Zanforlin, M. (in press).Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: Searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Animal Behaviour.
Ryan, C. M. E. (1982). Concept formation and individual recognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).Behaviour Analysis Letters,2, 213–220.
Shipley, T. F., &Kellman, P. J. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures: Evidence for an identity hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 106–120.
Slater, A., Morison, V., Somers, M., Mattock, A., Brown, E., &Taylor, D. (1990). Newborn and older infants’ perception of partly occluded objects.Infant Behavior & Development,13, 33–49.
Spelke, E. S. (1982). Perceptual knowledge of objects in infancy. In J. Mehler, M. Garrett, & E. Spelke(Eds.),Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 409–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spelke, E. S. (1985). Perception of unity, persistence, and identity: Thoughts on infants’ conceptions of objects. In J. Mehler& R. Fox (Eds.), Infant and neonate cognition (pp. 89–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Towe, A. L. (1954). A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,47, 283–287.
Vallortigara, G. (1992a). Affiliation and aggression as related to gender in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).Journal of Comparative Psychology,106, 53–57.
Vallortigara, G. (1992b). Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick.Neuropsychologia,30, 761–768.
Vallortigara, G., &Andrew,R. J. (1991). Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner.Animal Behaviour,41, 187–194.
Vallortigara, G., &Andrew, R. J. (1994). Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick.Behavioural Processes,33, 41–58.
Vallortigara, G., Zanforlin, M., &Compostella, S. (1990). Perceptual organization in animal learning: Cues or objects?Ethology,85, 89–102.
Vaughan, W., &Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 256–271.
von der Heydt, R., &Peterhans, E. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: I. Lines of pattern discontinuity.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1731–1748.
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., &Baumgartner, G. (1984). Il lusory contours and cortical neuron responses.Science,224, 1260–1262.
Watanabe, S., &Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons.Bird Behaviour,9, 20–29.
Watanabe, S., Lea, S. E. G., &Dittrich, W. H. (1993). What can we learn from experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In H. P. Zeigler & H.-J. Bishof(Eds.),Vision, brain, and behavior in birds (pp. 352–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953).Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Zajonc, R. B., Wilson, W. R., &Rajecki, D. W. (1975). Affiliation and social discrimination produced by brief exposure in day-old domestic chicks.Animal Behaviour,23, 131–138.
Zanforlin, M. (1981). Visual perception of complex forms (anomalous surfaces) in chicks.Italian Journal of Psychology,8, 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Part of this work was done by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree in the Psychology Department of the University of Padua. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Gaetano Kanizsa, with whom one of us (G.V.) had the pleasure of discussing the problem of studying amodal completion in animals.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G. Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 971–976 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205456
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205456