Abstract
Four experiments are described that determine whether or not syntactic complexity affects the visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences. The results indicate that sentences containing only one sentence in the underlying structure are more accurately reported than sentences containing two underlying sentences. It is shown that this result is not due solely to distortion of the input, but is likely to reflect the rate at which structural representations of the input can be developed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CHOMSKY, N.Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass M.I.T. Press, 1965.
COMPTON, A. J. Aural perception of sentences of different syntactic structures and lengths. Language & Speech, 1967, 10, 81–87.
CROWDE, R, R. G., & MORTON, J. Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 365–373.
ERIKSEN, C. W. Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 87–92.
FODOR, J. A., & GARRETT, M. Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 289–296.
FOSS, D. J., & LYNCH, R. H. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure on decision times. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 145–148.
HABER, R. N., & STANDING, L. Clarity and recognition of masked and degraded stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 13, 83–84.
HAKES, D. T., & CAIRNS, H. S. Do relative pronouns affect sentence comprehension? raper presented at the meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, 1969.
KAHNEMAN, D. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 404–425.
KOLERS, P. A., & KATZMAN, M. T. Naming sequentia1ly presented letters and words. Language & Speech, 1966, 9, 84–95.
MAYZNER, M. S., TRESSELT, M. E., & COHEN, A. Preliminary findings on some effects of very fast sequential input rates on perception. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 513–514.
MEHLER, J., & CAREY, P. The role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6, 335–338.
MEWHORT, D. J. K., MERIKLE, P. M., & BRYDEN, M. P. On the transfer from iconic to short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 89–94.
MILLER, G. A. Decision units in the perception of speech. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1962, IT-8, 81–83.
MILLER, G. A., HEISE, G. A., & LICHTEN, W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 41, 329–335.
MILLER, G. A., & ISARD, S. Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 217–228.
NEISSER, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
SPERLING, G. Approximations to a model of short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 285–292.
YNTEMA, D. B., WOZENCRAFT, F. T., & KLEM, L. Immediate serial recall of digits presented at very high rates. Paper presented to Psychonomic Society, 1964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, K.I. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 215–221 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210208
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210208