Abstract
Visual stimuli seen previously as distractors in a visual search task are subsequently evaluated more negatively than those seen as targets. An attentional inhibition account for this distractor-devaluation effect posits that associative links between attentional inhibition and to-be-ignored stimuli are established during search, stored, and then later reinstantiated, implying that distractor devaluation may require visual working memory (WM) resources. To assess this, we measured distractor devaluation with and without a concurrent visual WM load. Participants viewed a memory array, performed a simple search task, evaluated one of the search items (or a novel item), and then viewed a memory test array. Although distractor devaluation was observed with low (and no) WM load, it was absent when WM load was increased. This result supports the notions that active association of current attentional states with stimuli requires WM and that memory for these associations plays a role in affective response.
Article PDF
References
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415–437.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 545–552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103–128.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychology, 15, 312–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00459.x
Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., & Kunar, M. A. (2004). The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1055–1061.
Goolsby, B. A., Shapiro, K. L., Silvert, L., Kiss, M., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G., et al. (in press). Feature-based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention. Visual Cognition. doi:10.1080/13506280801904095
Griffiths, O., & Mitchell, C. J. (2007). Negative priming reduces affective ratings. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1119–1129. doi:10.1080/02699930701664930
Jackson, M. C., & Raymond, J. E. (2008). Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 556–568. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.556
Kiss, M., Goolsby, B. A., Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., Silvert, L., Nobre, A. C., et al. (2007). Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: Event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1316–1322. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1316
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557–558. doi:10.1126/science.7352271
Oh, S.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275–281.
Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 537–542. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci462.x
Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Westoby, N. (2005). Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1404–1415. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1404
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01413
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269–274.
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219–224. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00339
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00154
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Integrative Analysis of Brain and Behaviour Initiative Grant BBS/B/16178 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, U.K.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goolsby, B.A., Shapiro, K.L. & Raymond, J.E. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 133–138 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.133
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.133