A Systematic Review of Evidence for Education and Training Interventions in Microsurgery

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Over the past decade, driven by advances in educational theory and pressures for efficiency in the clinical environment, there has been a shift in surgical education and training towards enhanced simulation training. Microsurgery is a technical skill with a steep competency learning curve on which the clinical outcome greatly depends. This paper investigates the evidence for educational and training interventions of traditional microsurgical skills courses in order to establish the best evidence practice in education and training and curriculum design. A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases was performed to identify randomized control trials looking at educational and training interventions that objectively improved microsurgical skill acquisition, and these were critically appraised using the BestBETs group methodology. The databases search yielded 1,148, 1,460, and 2,277 citations respectively. These were then further limited to randomized controlled trials from which abstract reviews reduced the number to 5 relevant randomised controlled clinical trials. The best evidence supported a laboratory based low fidelity model microsurgical skills curriculum. There was strong evidence that technical skills acquired on low fidelity models transfers to improved performance on higher fidelity human cadaver models and that self directed practice leads to improved technical performance. Although there is significant paucity in the literature to support current microsurgical education and training practices, simulated training on low fidelity models in microsurgery is an effective intervention that leads to acquisition of transferable skills and improved technical performance. Further research to identify educational interventions associated with accelerated skill acquisition is required.

This article was presented at the Inaugural Meeting of the International Microsurgery Simulation Society on Jun 30, 2012 in London, UK.

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2013

Accepted: 08 February 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2013. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Tsuda S, Scott D, Doyle J. et al. Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg 2009; 46: 271-370
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kern DE, Thomas PA. Hughes. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 3 Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Internet]. Clayton: Australia; 2006. cited 2013 Apr 16 Available from: https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hemila/karlowski/handbook_4_2_6_Karlowski.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 4 Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK. et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 167-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 2004; 172: 378-381
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 374-381
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H. et al. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 400-409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Price J, Naik V, Boodhwani M. et al. A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 496-503
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R. Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1556-1567
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 358-361
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A. et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 291-300
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2664-2669
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Ilie VG, Ilie VI, Dobreanu C. et al. Training of microsurgical skills on nonliving models. Microsurgery 2008; 28: 571-577
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Champion HR, Gallagher AG. Surgical simulation - a 'good idea whose time has come'. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 767-768
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH. et al. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 166-179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 33-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ahlberg G, Hultcrantz R, Jaramillo E. et al. Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist?. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1198-1204
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC. et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 361-368
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003; 23: 317-322
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kalu PU, Atkins J, Baker D. et al. How do we assess microsurgical skill?. Microsurgery 2005; 25: 25-29
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Temple CL, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 215-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar